The U.S. Supreme Court will soon decide a case that may allow federal courts to involve themselves in a greater number of public policy disputes. Hawkes Co., Inc. v. EPA, argued on March 30, will decide whether certain types of federal agency action can be challenged in court. Many who observed the oral argument predict the justices will vote to allow more agency actions to be challenged.

But rather than drawing criticism from the left or right over increasing “judicial activism,” such a decision likely will be—and should be—applauded on all sides of the political spectrum. Liberals and conservatives alike should agree that judicial oversight of federal agencies is necessary to help prevent agency overreaching.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]