When lawyers for Life Technologies Corp. filed a cert petition with the U.S. Supreme Court in its patent case in June 2015, they included the fact that the client company was “an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.”
The high court granted cert a year later, and when veteran advocate Carter Phillips of Sidley Austin filed the merits brief in September 2016, he dutifully supplied the same parent-company information again, as required by the court’s Rule 29.6.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
