6 Tips to Make Students Better Attorneys
Whether a law student wants to do transactional work or litigation, here are six things he can do while in law school to equip him with the tools to be a successful young attorney.
May 14, 2015 at 09:45 AM
4 minute read
The best compliment a first year associate attorney can receive from his or her supervising attorney is the associate's work rivals that of a seasoned attorney. The traditional law school curriculum is often criticized as being too esoteric, devoid of practical training that often rewards young attorneys with that desired compliment and praise.
My law school did not require all students to do some type of practicum, and while I went to a “traditional” law school, I still graduated feeling more than prepared to begin practicing. I took it upon myself to take advantage of the many school offerings that paired my traditional law school education with practicality. Whether a law student wants to do transactional work or litigation (an arbitrary distinction), here are six things he can do while in law school to equip him with the tools to be a successful young attorney. On the flipside, senior lawyers looking for mentor-mentees opportunities can contact a law school to learn how to become involved in any of the following programs.
1. Moot court, mock trial, arbitration, negotiations and client counseling competitions. In the words of Nike, “Just Do It.” There is no better way for any law student to get a head start on practicing than by competing in moot court, mock trial, arbitration, negotiations and client counseling competitions (“advocacy competitions”). The benefits are endless. Competitors fine-tune their legal research and writing skills, gain a working knowledge of the rules of evidence or appellate procedure, and argue before panels of real judges and practitioners. It's not uncommon in the world of advocacy competitions for competitors to receive summer clerkships or even full-time offers based on the impression they made on the scoring judges. Advocacy competitions also give students a chance to travel and meet other students, who inevitably will end up as colleagues. And attorneys will learn that “May it please the court” is not a question, but a statement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDean Developments: 2 Law Schools Appoint New Leadership, ABF Elects New Fellow
4 minute read2023 Go-To Law Schools: For Judicial Clerkships, Government and Public Interest Jobs, Small Schools Reign
6 minute read'People Are Pissed': Pass/Fail Grading Controversy Roils Law Schools
Trending Stories
- 1The Future of Law: Harnessing AI Without Compromising Integrity
- 2Largest Law Firms: Locations, Starting Salary and Clients By Firm
- 3Largest Law Firms: Firm Leadership and Practice Areas
- 4Largest Law Firms: New Jersey and Firmwide Attorney Count
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Marc Mandel, Senior Vice President & General Counsel at EXOS
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250