Pardon Dan Sheehan for not being completely satisfied with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruling vacating a contempt finding against him.
That’s because Sheehan believes the decision fails to pass judgment on the gravity of what U.S. District Judge Vanessa Gilmore of Houston did to him during a May 2013 hearing. During that hearing, Gilmore had Sheehan handcuffed in open court and jailed by U.S. marshals until his client removed deragotory postings about an opposing litigant from the Internet.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
