Houston Lawyers Accused of Running a 'Barratry Pyramid Scheme'
A Texas trucker alleges Houston plaintiff's lawyers used case runners to identify about 10,000 clients.
June 14, 2017 at 03:00 AM
9 minute read
A Texas truck driver sued Houston plaintiff's lawyers Jimmy Williamson and Cyndi Rusnak, their firm and the Law Offices of Michael Pohl, alleging they formed a “barratry joint venture” to operate a “barratry pyramid scheme” to solicit clients to sue BP over the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
Plaintiff Dezzie Brumfield alleges in a petition filed June 8 in the 189th District Court in Harris County that the joint venture paid about $5 million in “barratry pass-through money” to consultants who in turn paid case runners to unlawfully solicit clients “in what can only be described as a barratry pyramid scheme.” Over a few months in 2012, Brumfield alleges, the joint venture had “improperly solicited as many as ten thousand potential clients who would sue British Petroleum over the oil spill,” but the venture later terminated many of them as clients.
Brumfield alleges he received an unsolicited call in 2012 from a case runner who told him he was guaranteed $50,000 if he would hire Williamson, Rusnak and Pohl to file a claim for him against BP. Brumfield alleges he sent Williamson & Rusnak his claim paperwork, and he continued to provide information from 2012 to 2015, but the firm ended that representation in August 2015, just three weeks before a deadline to file a claim against BP.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Who Called in the Feds Says Witness-Tampering Allegations in Civil Trial New to Him
23 minute readJ&J Aims to Wipe Out $417M Talc Verdict, Citing 'Passion and Prejudice' of Jurors
24 minute readGM's Bellwether Victory in NY May Not Predict Future of Ignition Switch Litigation
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Not the President's Personal Lawyer': Lawyers Share Concerns Over How AG Pick Bondi’s Loyalism to Trump May Impact DOJ
- 2US Judge OKs Partial Release of Ex-Special Counsel's Final Report in Election Case
- 3The Demise of Truth and Transparency in Federal Sentencing
- 4Former Phila. Solicitor Sozi Tulante Rejoins Dechert
- 5'I've Seen Terrible Things': Lawyer Predicts Spike in Hazing Suits
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250