Coming to Terms With Contractual Liability Coverage
Few provisions in general liability insurance policies are more misunderstood than contractual liability coverage.
September 29, 2017 at 07:00 PM
5 minute read
Few provisions in general liability insurance policies are more misunderstood than contractual liability coverage. A scan of the basic insuring agreement in a CGL policy does not say that the insurer will cover liability that its insured assumes by way of contractual obligation. In fact, the basic insuring agreement doesn't address this question at all. Contractual liability coverage enters the CGL policy as an exception to an exclusion. Because of this, it can be difficult to determine if coverage exists and what its scope is. It is possible, however, understand contractual liability coverage by starting from the underlying contract.
Provisions in which one of the parties agrees to indemnify the other occur in construction contracts, oil and gas contracts, day work drilling contracts, the lease of premises and a host of other contractual arrangements. Each one contains one or more of the following provisions: (1) the first party agrees to indemnify the second for the first party's negligence or fault; (2) the first party indemnifies the second if both are at fault; (3) the first party indemnifies the second if the second party is solely at fault; and (4) the first party agrees to pay attorney fees and other costs incurred by the second in responding to an indemnified claim. (Some or all of these provisions may be limited by state law.)
Because these provisions can be exceptionally broad in scope, most general liability insurance policies contain exclusions for “bodily injury or property damage for which the insured is obligated to pay damages by reason of the assumption of liability in a contract or agreement.” To ameliorate the possibility that this exclusion will swallow up liability coverage, insurers add exceptions to this exclusion which have the effect of restoring some coverage for certain activities or damages. In this article we focus on the two most common exceptions
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJustices Take Time to Answer Ken Paxton About Handguns at the State Fair
4 minute readDraftKings Faces $65M Lawsuit by National Football League Players Association
4 minute readFTC's Ban on Noncompete Agreements Struck Down on the Eve of Implementation
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250