Insurance Company Files Fraud Suit Against 'Hire a Dick!' Lawyer in Houston
A Texas insurance company alleges Houston lawyer and a private insurance adjuster conspired to defraud it by filing claims on behalf of homeowners and then collecting insurance claim payments for their personal financial benefit.
October 16, 2017 at 06:50 PM
8 minute read
Steven Badger
A Texas insurance company is suing Houston lawyer Eric Dick and his firm, and public adjuster Solomon Eric Bowens and his firm, alleging they conspired in a “fraudulent scheme” to submit storm damage insurance claims with the intent of financially benefiting themselves instead of the homeowners.
Southern Vanguard Insurance Co. of Houston alleges that in June, Dick Law Firm deposited a $39,559.78 insurance company check payable to Ruben Lopez, Ester Lopez and a bank for a storm-related insurance claim. But Lopez didn't hire the firm or get the money. In fact, Southern Vanguard alleges in the petition that Lopez did not find out about the insurance claim or the payment until August, when he filed a new claim with the insurance company for hail damage to his roof from the 2015 storm.
“All insurance claim proceeds collected under this fraudulent scheme were kept by Bowens and Dick, with none of the proceeds going to the homeowner,” Southern Vanguard alleges in the petition, filed on Oct. 10 in state district court in Houston.
Dick did not immediately respond to a request for comment left at Dick Law Firm, but his attorney, Rogelio Garcia of Houston, said the allegations are “absurd” and Dick categorically denies them.
He said Dick and his firm have ethically represented Lopez, and he alleges “the money has been mailed to him.”
Garcia said Dick will bring counterclaims against Southern Vanguard. He said the insurance company may have sued Dick because his client has represented a number of Hispanic policy-owners who have “made Southern Vanguard pay pretty substantial money.”
Dick advertises his practice online, with video ads in which he says, “I'll hound 'em and pound 'em to get what you deserve. Need a lawyer? Hire a Dick!”
Public adjuster Bowens said he has no idea why he was named in the suit.
“I'm totally innocent and I have nothing to do with this matter,” Bowens said, adding that he simply did his job as a public adjuster.
Southern Vanguard alleges in the petition that Bowens approached Lopez about assisting him with an insurance claim shortly after a May 2015 storm in the Houston area. The plaintiff alleges Bowens looked at the Lopez house and had Lopez sign documents without giving him a copy.
Lopez never heard from Bowens again, according to the petition, but Bowens filed a claim for storm damage. Ultimately, Southern Vanguard determined that the damage to the Lopez house was less than the deductible.
“Southern Vanguard never heard from Bowens again. Southern Vanguard was never notified of any disagreement with its claim measure for the Lopez home,” the plaintiff alleges in the petition.
However, Southern Vanguard alleges that on Sept. 28, 2015, Dick and his firm filed a lawsuit purportedly on Lopez's behalf alleging breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing, breach of contract, fraud, and conspiracy in connection with his claim. After going through an appraisal process, Southern Vanguard issued the $39,559.78 check for Lopez's claim.
Southern Vanguard alleges the Dick Law Firm remotely deposited the check on June 26, but on Aug. 2, Lopez made a new claim to Southern Vanguard for hail damage to his roof.
“When Southern Vanguard began investigating this new claim, Southern Vanguard learned that Lopez had no awareness whatsoever of the previously filed lawsuit, the invoked appraisal process, or the $39,559.78 payment,” the insurance company alleges, adding that Lopez had not retained Dick Law Firm, and he had not been asked to negotiate the insurance check.
Southern Vanguard brings multiple causes of action against the defendants, including fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, theft, and liability pursuant to the Texas Theft Liability Act. It seeks up to $200,000 in damages, including actual and punitive damages.
Plaintiffs attorney Steven Badger, a partner at Zelle in Dallas, said he represents insurance companies and has been very vocal in addressing fraud and other illegal conduct by lawyers in connection with insurance claims.
“Homeowners do not realize they are signing with an attorney. They've been approached by someone who says, 'Hey, we can get you a free roof and free money. That's the last they hear,'” Badger said.
As to the allegations in Southern Vanguard's suit, Badger said, “The facts stated in the petition speak for themselves.”
Steven Badger
A Texas insurance company is suing Houston lawyer Eric Dick and his firm, and public adjuster Solomon Eric Bowens and his firm, alleging they conspired in a “fraudulent scheme” to submit storm damage insurance claims with the intent of financially benefiting themselves instead of the homeowners.
Southern Vanguard Insurance Co. of Houston alleges that in June, Dick Law Firm deposited a $39,559.78 insurance company check payable to Ruben Lopez, Ester Lopez and a bank for a storm-related insurance claim. But Lopez didn't hire the firm or get the money. In fact, Southern Vanguard alleges in the petition that Lopez did not find out about the insurance claim or the payment until August, when he filed a new claim with the insurance company for hail damage to his roof from the 2015 storm.
“All insurance claim proceeds collected under this fraudulent scheme were kept by Bowens and Dick, with none of the proceeds going to the homeowner,” Southern Vanguard alleges in the petition, filed on Oct. 10 in state district court in Houston.
Dick did not immediately respond to a request for comment left at Dick Law Firm, but his attorney, Rogelio Garcia of Houston, said the allegations are “absurd” and Dick categorically denies them.
He said Dick and his firm have ethically represented Lopez, and he alleges “the money has been mailed to him.”
Garcia said Dick will bring counterclaims against Southern Vanguard. He said the insurance company may have sued Dick because his client has represented a number of Hispanic policy-owners who have “made Southern Vanguard pay pretty substantial money.”
Dick advertises his practice online, with video ads in which he says, “I'll hound 'em and pound 'em to get what you deserve. Need a lawyer? Hire a Dick!”
Public adjuster Bowens said he has no idea why he was named in the suit.
“I'm totally innocent and I have nothing to do with this matter,” Bowens said, adding that he simply did his job as a public adjuster.
Southern Vanguard alleges in the petition that Bowens approached Lopez about assisting him with an insurance claim shortly after a May 2015 storm in the Houston area. The plaintiff alleges Bowens looked at the Lopez house and had Lopez sign documents without giving him a copy.
Lopez never heard from Bowens again, according to the petition, but Bowens filed a claim for storm damage. Ultimately, Southern Vanguard determined that the damage to the Lopez house was less than the deductible.
“Southern Vanguard never heard from Bowens again. Southern Vanguard was never notified of any disagreement with its claim measure for the Lopez home,” the plaintiff alleges in the petition.
However, Southern Vanguard alleges that on Sept. 28, 2015, Dick and his firm filed a lawsuit purportedly on Lopez's behalf alleging breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing, breach of contract, fraud, and conspiracy in connection with his claim. After going through an appraisal process, Southern Vanguard issued the $39,559.78 check for Lopez's claim.
Southern Vanguard alleges the Dick Law Firm remotely deposited the check on June 26, but on Aug. 2, Lopez made a new claim to Southern Vanguard for hail damage to his roof.
“When Southern Vanguard began investigating this new claim, Southern Vanguard learned that Lopez had no awareness whatsoever of the previously filed lawsuit, the invoked appraisal process, or the $39,559.78 payment,” the insurance company alleges, adding that Lopez had not retained Dick Law Firm, and he had not been asked to negotiate the insurance check.
Southern Vanguard brings multiple causes of action against the defendants, including fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, theft, and liability pursuant to the Texas Theft Liability Act. It seeks up to $200,000 in damages, including actual and punitive damages.
Plaintiffs attorney Steven Badger, a partner at Zelle in Dallas, said he represents insurance companies and has been very vocal in addressing fraud and other illegal conduct by lawyers in connection with insurance claims.
“Homeowners do not realize they are signing with an attorney. They've been approached by someone who says, 'Hey, we can get you a free roof and free money. That's the last they hear,'” Badger said.
As to the allegations in Southern Vanguard's suit, Badger said, “The facts stated in the petition speak for themselves.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSeyfarth Launches Energy Transactions Practice in Houston With Polsinelli Team
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 2'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 3Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 4Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 5Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250