Federal Judge Rules for Immigrant Teen Seeking an Abortion
The judge's order also temporarily restrains the defendants from forcing Jane Doe to reveal her abortion decision to anyone or from retaliating against her or the contractor that operates the shelter where she is living.
October 19, 2017 at 01:14 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has issued a temporary restraining order to prevent U.S. officials from blocking a 17-year-old immigrant who entered this country illegally and is being held in Texas from terminating her pregnancy.
“We won!” Austin attorney Susan Hays, legal director for Jane's Due Process, said shortly after U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan issued her Oct. 19 order in Garza v. Hargan, et al. “Janes everywhere are rejoicing that their dignity and humanity have been restored by the court.
“As a lawyer, I feel so much better that the rule of law still means something in this country,” added Hays, who has been assisting the American Civil Liberties Union with the girl's case.
In reporting on a hearing on the girl's application for a TRO, The Washington Post noted that lawyers for the U.S. Department of Justice had argued that the Central American teenager, who crossed the border into the United States from Mexico in September, did not have a constitutional right to an elective abortion in federal custody unless she was facing a medical emergency.
Chutkan ordered the defendants Eric Hargan, acting secretary of Health and Human Services, and two other federal officials, to transport Jane Doe or allow her to be transported by her guardian ad litem “promptly and without delay” to the abortion provider nearest to the shelter where she is living. The judge's order requires that JD be allowed to receive state-mandated counseling by Oct. 19 and obtain an abortion no later than Oct. 21.
If the defendants are not immediately restrained from preventing the girl's transportation to an abortion facility, she could “suffer irreparable injury in the form of, at a minimum, increased risk to her health and perhaps the permanent inability to obtain a desired abortion to which she is legally entitled,” the judge noted in her order.
The teen, who is reported to be about 15 weeks pregnant, previously obtained a judicial bypass that enables her to have an abortion without parental consent. Hays said private funds will pay for the girl's abortion.
The judge's order also temporarily restrains the defendants from forcing Jane Doe to reveal her abortion decision to anyone or from retaliating against her or the contractor that operates the shelter where she is living.
The Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the judge's order. Hays said she expects the DOJ to appeal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All5th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
5 minute readTexas AG Paxton Stops Biden's Spousal Parole For Undocumented Immigrants
4 minute readTexas Social Media Law: Federal Circuit Gives Trial Court Instructions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-68
- 2Friday Newspaper
- 3Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 4Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 5NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250