US Judge Hits Texas Lawmaker with $2.9 Million Judgment in Legal Mal Case
U.S. District Judge Micaela Alvarez of McAllen has hit a south Texas lawmaker with a $2.9 million legal malpractice judgment after determining the…
October 23, 2017 at 02:58 PM
2 minute read
U.S. District Judge Micaela Alvarez of McAllen has hit a south Texas lawmaker with a $2.9 million legal malpractice judgment after determining the lawyer failed to disclose to a client that he had a corporate relationship with a state district judge who was presiding over their case.
Sergio Muñoz Jr., a Democratic state lawmaker from Palmview, was sued in federal court in 2014 by Law Funder, a New Jersey litigation funding company. Law Funder had previously hired Muñoz to represent them in a complicated divorce proceeding filed in Hidalgo County in which they claimed an interest in a Mexican law firm that was part of the case's division of assets.
Law Funder alleged that Muñoz failed to tell them he had a previous corporate relationship with 449th District Judge Jesse Contreras in their former law practice of Contreras & Munoz. Over a year after retaining Muñoz, Contreras was disqualified from hearing the case after a senior district judge ruled he had a corporate association with Muñoz.
In their legal malpractice complaint against Muñoz and his now solo law firm, Law Funder alleged they never would have hired Muñoz if they previously known of his relationship with Contreras.
Alvarez granted a default judgment legal malpractice award against Sergio Muñoz Jr. in February after ruling he'd delayed the case by refusing to cooperate in the discovery process.
Alvarez also ruled that Law Funder had presented enough evidence that Muñoz committed legal malpractice by failing to disclose his business relationship with Contreras.
“The existence of defendants' corporate association with Judge Contreras thus created a duty for the defendants to be honest with plaintiff from the beginning about this relationship, so plaintiff could make an informed decision about whether or not to retain defendants as counsel of record,” Alvarez wrote in her order.
Alvarez also noted that Law Funder also had sufficiently plead actual damages that Muñoz's business relationship with Contreras ultimately led to Contreras disqualification, reversing years of litigation that cost Law Funder over a million dollars.
Muñoz and his attorney Francisco J. Rodriguez of McAllen both did not return calls for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Malpractice: Texas Supreme Court OKs 'Pernicious Distortion of Positions'
4 minute readThe Buzbee Law Firm Accused of Client Abuse in Two Louisiana Lawsuits
4 minute readDLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250