Lawyer Denies Witness Tampering in Hip Implant Trial
A lawyer for DePuy Orthopaedics filed a motion saying she "at no time" asked a sales rep to communicate with a doctor who was scheduled to testify at a high-stakes hip implant trial.
October 24, 2017 at 04:42 PM
5 minute read
A lawyer for DePuy Orthopaedics, the defendant in a bellwether hip implant trial in Dallas, said in a motion filed Tuesday that said she did not ask a DePuy sales representative to “do anything or communicate” with a doctor who filed an affidavit suggesting witness tampering.
In the motion, filed by Drinker, Biddle & Reath associate Jennifer Brennan and partner Michael Zogby, the DePuy attorneys allege that Brennan made several calls to sales rep Glenn Swajger on Oct. 12 and 13 but she never asked him to do anything other than make himself available for a conference call with the trial team Oct. 13.
“She certainly did not tell Mr. Swajger to do anything or to communicate with Dr. [David] Shein. She merely explained that the trial team wanted to visit with him, explained why, and worked through the timing of such call given Mr. Swajger's busy schedule,” Brennan and Zogby allege in their motion “requesting logistics for the inquiry” related to Dr. Shine.
On Oct. 16, U.S. District Judge Ed Kinkeade said he would have the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's office question Shein, Swajger and others, including lawyers, in connection with the affidavit Shein filed Oct. 15 on the eve of the day he was to be called as a witness by the plaintiffs' attorneys.
In that affidavit, Shein said Swajger told him during a surgery-related conversation at his hospital on the morning of Oct. 13 that he worried “there could be ramifications” for the doctor's medical practice in connection with his upcoming Dallas testimony. Shein said in the affidavit that Swajger told him the DePuy lawyers had contacted him on Oct. 12 and were pressuring him, and making him anxious.
Plaintiffs attorney Mark Lanier raised concerns about witness tampering after Shein filed the affidavit. While noting he wasn't jumping to conclusions, Kinkeade said the affidavit was serious and “certainly disturbing and disconcerting to me.”
In Tuesday's motion, Brennan and Zogby asked Kinkeade to adopt their proposal for the logistics of the questioning. They suggested Assistant U.S. Attorney Marcus Bush or a designee interview Brennan, and then Kinkeade question her in open court, limiting examination to communications Brennan had with Swajger on Oct. 12 and 13 prior to the conference call Swajger had with the trial team at 3:01 p.m. on Oct. 13.
Brennan and Zogby noted in the motion that DePuy is only waiving attorney-client privilege in connection with communications between Brennan and Swajger on Oct. 12 and Oct. 13 up until the 3:01 p.m. call with the trial team. They also said Zogby should not be questioned because he was not on the phone calls in question.
In the motion, the lawyers allege that Brennan left a voicemail for Swajger at 4:25 p.m. on Oct. 12, and then he returned the call at 4:56 p.m. “Ms. Brennan communicated the trial team request to have a call and discussed the timing of such call. Ultimately, Mr. Swajger suggested that she call him back the next day at 11 a.m. because he would then have a better idea of what his schedule would be like for the day,” the lawyers wrote.
The lawyers wrote that Brennan called Swajger at 11 a.m. Oct. 13 to propose a 3 p.m. call, called him back at 2:55 p.m. to confirm that time still worked, and then called him back at 3:01 p.m. to patch him into the conference call. Zogby was on that trial team call.
The lawyers wrote that their attorney, Polsinelli shareholder William Mateja of Dallas, contacted Bush to offer Brennan for an interview similar to his prior interview of Shein.
Lanier, founder of Lanier Law Firm of Houston, said Shein was interviewed by the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's office on Oct. 16 before he left to fly back to New York. Lanier could not be immediately reached for comment.
Richard Roper, a partner at Thompson & Knight in Dallas who represents DePuy, its parent, Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Services in connection with the witness tampering investigation, declined to comment.
In an amended certification filed Oct. 20, Roper certified that his clients have identified individuals, including inside and outside counsel for the companies, who may have communicated with Swajger from Sept. 12 through Oct. 13 about Shein, and have preserved all communications.
Also on Oct. 20, Mateja filed certification that his clients, including Brennan, a Drinker Biddle associate in Florham Park, New Jersey, Zogby, a partner in New York and Florham Park, and the firm, have put a preservation hold on all communications relating to Swajger and Shein from Sept. 12 through Oct. 13.
The bellwether trial, which is hard-fought, started Sept. 19.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHomegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
6 minute readHouston Appeals Court Split Over Race Discrimination Suit Involving COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250