Lawyer Denies Witness Tampering in Hip Implant Trial
A lawyer for DePuy Orthopaedics filed a motion saying she "at no time" asked a sales rep to communicate with a doctor who was scheduled to testify at a high-stakes hip implant trial.
October 24, 2017 at 04:42 PM
5 minute read
A lawyer for DePuy Orthopaedics, the defendant in a bellwether hip implant trial in Dallas, said in a motion filed Tuesday that said she did not ask a DePuy sales representative to “do anything or communicate” with a doctor who filed an affidavit suggesting witness tampering.
In the motion, filed by Drinker, Biddle & Reath associate Jennifer Brennan and partner Michael Zogby, the DePuy attorneys allege that Brennan made several calls to sales rep Glenn Swajger on Oct. 12 and 13 but she never asked him to do anything other than make himself available for a conference call with the trial team Oct. 13.
“She certainly did not tell Mr. Swajger to do anything or to communicate with Dr. [David] Shein. She merely explained that the trial team wanted to visit with him, explained why, and worked through the timing of such call given Mr. Swajger's busy schedule,” Brennan and Zogby allege in their motion “requesting logistics for the inquiry” related to Dr. Shine.
On Oct. 16, U.S. District Judge Ed Kinkeade said he would have the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's office question Shein, Swajger and others, including lawyers, in connection with the affidavit Shein filed Oct. 15 on the eve of the day he was to be called as a witness by the plaintiffs' attorneys.
In that affidavit, Shein said Swajger told him during a surgery-related conversation at his hospital on the morning of Oct. 13 that he worried “there could be ramifications” for the doctor's medical practice in connection with his upcoming Dallas testimony. Shein said in the affidavit that Swajger told him the DePuy lawyers had contacted him on Oct. 12 and were pressuring him, and making him anxious.
Plaintiffs attorney Mark Lanier raised concerns about witness tampering after Shein filed the affidavit. While noting he wasn't jumping to conclusions, Kinkeade said the affidavit was serious and “certainly disturbing and disconcerting to me.”
In Tuesday's motion, Brennan and Zogby asked Kinkeade to adopt their proposal for the logistics of the questioning. They suggested Assistant U.S. Attorney Marcus Bush or a designee interview Brennan, and then Kinkeade question her in open court, limiting examination to communications Brennan had with Swajger on Oct. 12 and 13 prior to the conference call Swajger had with the trial team at 3:01 p.m. on Oct. 13.
Brennan and Zogby noted in the motion that DePuy is only waiving attorney-client privilege in connection with communications between Brennan and Swajger on Oct. 12 and Oct. 13 up until the 3:01 p.m. call with the trial team. They also said Zogby should not be questioned because he was not on the phone calls in question.
In the motion, the lawyers allege that Brennan left a voicemail for Swajger at 4:25 p.m. on Oct. 12, and then he returned the call at 4:56 p.m. “Ms. Brennan communicated the trial team request to have a call and discussed the timing of such call. Ultimately, Mr. Swajger suggested that she call him back the next day at 11 a.m. because he would then have a better idea of what his schedule would be like for the day,” the lawyers wrote.
The lawyers wrote that Brennan called Swajger at 11 a.m. Oct. 13 to propose a 3 p.m. call, called him back at 2:55 p.m. to confirm that time still worked, and then called him back at 3:01 p.m. to patch him into the conference call. Zogby was on that trial team call.
The lawyers wrote that their attorney, Polsinelli shareholder William Mateja of Dallas, contacted Bush to offer Brennan for an interview similar to his prior interview of Shein.
Lanier, founder of Lanier Law Firm of Houston, said Shein was interviewed by the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's office on Oct. 16 before he left to fly back to New York. Lanier could not be immediately reached for comment.
Richard Roper, a partner at Thompson & Knight in Dallas who represents DePuy, its parent, Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Services in connection with the witness tampering investigation, declined to comment.
In an amended certification filed Oct. 20, Roper certified that his clients have identified individuals, including inside and outside counsel for the companies, who may have communicated with Swajger from Sept. 12 through Oct. 13 about Shein, and have preserved all communications.
Also on Oct. 20, Mateja filed certification that his clients, including Brennan, a Drinker Biddle associate in Florham Park, New Jersey, Zogby, a partner in New York and Florham Park, and the firm, have put a preservation hold on all communications relating to Swajger and Shein from Sept. 12 through Oct. 13.
The bellwether trial, which is hard-fought, started Sept. 19.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNo Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Field Client Questions as Trump Issues Executive Orders on Industry Funding, Oversight
6 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250