Houston High School Student Sues District After Refusing to Stand for Pledge of Allegiance
A high school student has filed a free speech case against her school district in Houston federal court, alleging she was harassed and bullied by both…
October 25, 2017 at 03:31 PM
3 minute read
A high school student has filed a free speech case against her school district in Houston federal court, alleging she was harassed and bullied by both students and teachers after she refused to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance.
According to her recent complaint in Arceneaux v. Klein Independent School District, the 17-year-old plaintiff, identified in the opinion as M.O., alleged she has sat respectfully hundreds of times between 2014 and 2017 during the start of the day when students recite the pledge at Klein Oak High School. As a result of her protest, she was sent to the office, bullied by classmates and singled out for separate treatment by teachers.
M.O. later withdrew from Klein Oak in favor of homeschooling earlier this year at her own expense but returned after the summer break. Upon her return, M.O. was told by her sociology teacher that those who refused to complete the pledge would receive a zero in the class. He also compared those who refused to say the pledge to “Soviet communists, members of the Islamic faith seeking to impose Sharia law, and those who condone pedophilia,” according to the complaint.
In her complaint, M.O. alleges that under the First Amendment, public school students cannot be forced to stand for the pledge and the school district retaliated against her for engaging in protected speech.
She also notes in her complaint that a public school students' right not to stand for the pledge has existed since 1943. That year, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette that right extended to two students who refused to say the pledge for religious reasons.
“The right not to be forced to stand for the pledge is one of your earliest civil rights established in 1943,'' said Randall Kallinen, a Houston attorney who represents M.O. “Students do not lose the right to speak when they walk up the schoolhouse steps.”
Kallinen said M.O. is suing the school district because they failed to protect her free speech rights. “There were people in the Klein Independent School District that participated in this and ignored it. Basically, the school is setting forth a certain political agenda,'' he said.
In a statement, The Klein Independent School District denied the allegations.
“Klein ISD is aware of a lawsuit filed against the District and some of its employees and former employees that alleges that the district and employees have interfered with a student's exercise of her Constitutional right not to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance,” according to the statement.
“ Klein ISD denies the allegations and, after investigation and discussion with those involved over a three-year span, finds multiple discrepancies in the allegations,” the statement alleges. “Klein ISD continues to respect the rights of all students. As Klein ISD communicated to the family's attorney this summer, Klein ISD does not tolerate harassment against students.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTexas Attorneys Put Civil Rights Nonprofits on Notice About Defaming Right-Wing Conservatives
3 minute readPaxton's 2024 Agenda: Immigration, Climate, Transgender Issues, Social Media, Abortion, Elections
9 minute readHouston Appeals Court Split Over Race Discrimination Suit Involving COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Here's What Corporate Litigators Expect Del. Courts to Address in 2025
- 2U.S. Supreme Court Has No Jurisdiction Over Trump's New York Criminal Case: Prosecutors
- 3The Law Firm Disrupted: With KPMG's Proposed Entry, Arizona's Liberalized Legal Market is Getting Interesting
- 4Womble Bond Dickinson Adds New Leaders as Merger Is Completed
- 5Family's Disability Discrimination Suit Cleared to Go Forward Against Six Flags
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250