From Internet Sensation to Silence: Why Has Texas Supreme Court Justice Don Willett Stopped Tweeting?
For a man who considers himself “the most avid social-media judge in America”, Don Willett's monthlong silence on Twitter is almost deafening.Willett…
October 27, 2017 at 03:01 PM
5 minute read
For a man who considers himself “the most avid social-media judge in America”, Don Willett's monthlong silence on Twitter is almost deafening.
Willett became an internet sensation last year after President Donald Trump, during the election campaign, named the Texas Supreme Court Justice one of 11 people he'd consider naming to the U.S. Supreme Court — even though Willett had jovially mocked Trump in numerous tweets.
All must have been forgiven between the two avid Twitter users because on Sept. 28, Trump nominated Willett to a spot on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
“No Words,” Willett tweeted that day, thanking Trump from his account which now features a black-robed judge with a cowboy hat riding the blue Twitter bird as if it were a bucking bronco.
And since Sept. 28, Willett hasn't posted a single tweet. There have been no funny musings on the law, no pop culture references, and not a solitary update on the “wee Willetts” — his three young children.
Willett declined to comment about his decision to halt his use of Twitter.
Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Nathan Hecht notes that the U.S. Department of Justice usually advises judicial nominees not to make public statements while the U.S. Senate is considering confirmation.
“The advice is always to have a low a profile as you can during confirmation process — don't do anything that would draw attention,” said Hecht, nothing the same advice was given to Fifth Circuit Justice Priscilla Owen, who was promoted from the Texas Supreme Court to the Fifth Circuit by then-President George W. Bush in 2005. Willett was later appointed to the Texas high court by then-Gov. Rick Perry to replace Owen.
Evan Young, a partner in the Austin office of Baker Botts who is friends with Willett, said the judicial nominee's absence from Twitter is notable, but understandable.
“Given Justice Willett's prominence on Twitter, his comparative silence Sept. 28 has been widely noted, to put it mildly. But it is not just Twitter silence,” Young said.
Like all nominees for the federal bench, Willett is stepping back from all public speaking — not just tweeting — but speeches, interviews and all other forms of public communication, aside from this work on the Texas Supreme Court, Young said.
“It only seems like a special Twitter limitation because so many people looked forward every day to what would issue forth from @JusticeWillett—and some (including me) are going through withdrawal,” Young said. “But as the Senate considers his and other nominations, it's entirely appropriate for all those nominees to step back and let the nomination process run its course.”
Willett, who likes to keep his tweets lighthearted and humorous, has two cardinal rules about the medium: He never discusses cases that may come before him and he refuses to engage in what he calls “political bomb throwing.” He primarily tweets to educate the public about the judiciary and to raise his own profile in a state where judges must run for office and judicial name I.D. among voters is extremely low.
“People are genuinely amazed that a nerdy judge can be engaging, and believe me, my geekery is on an uber-elite level. But it's rare for a Supreme Court Justice to step out from behind the bench and demystify things,” Willett told Texas Lawyer in an interview last year.
“I began using Twitter as a political communications tool, but over time it's become my primary news feed — the best way to stay abreast of warp-speed happenings in the world and to enjoy the musings of smart, fascinating people. Twitter is a neat, one-stop compilation of smart, incisive viewpoints on every imaginable topic from a riveting cross-section of folks,” Willett said in that interview.
Assuming Willett is confirmed by the U.S. Senate, many of his followers wonder if the new Fifth Circuit Justice will pick his Twitter handle up where he left off.
“That is the million-dollar question,” said Brantley Starr, a deputy Texas attorney general who served as Willett's first law clerk on the high court.
“It's a close call. The reason he tweets now is completely understandable by structure,” noting that Willett uses his account to raise both his political profile and educate the public about the life of a judge.
But federal judges are more isolated from the public and rarely use Twitter, Starr said. However, some public contact among federal judges is encouraged, including teaching at law schools and giving public speeches about the judiciary, he said.
“The structural incentive is not the same,” Starr said of the potential for Willett tweeting as a Fifth Circuit judge. “Maybe it's so ingrained in his DNA. I could see him tweeting, maybe less, or maybe not at all.''
Dallas appellate lawyer David Coale is doubtful that Willett's Twitter use with be the same should he join the Fifth Circuit.
“On the federal bench it's radio silence because nobody tweets. And if you're the new guy you don't want to come in blazing tweets,” Coale said. “He works and play wells with others.”
Coale, who also follows Willett on Twitter, said he misses the justice's tweets.
“I wonder how the wee Willetts are doing?” Coale asked. “I hope they are doing well.''
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOvertime Rewind: Texas Court Ruling Unravels FLSA Salary Level Increases
4 minute readDivided 5th Circuit Shoots Down Nasdaq Diversity Rules
Uvalde Shooting 'Fresh in Everyone's Mind:' Lone Dissenting Judge Disagrees with School's Disciplinary Decision Over Pellet Gun
Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250