And the Envelope Please
With awards season underway, don't we deserve our own laurels for those “you just can't make this stuff up” episodes that livened up the legal system over the past year?
November 01, 2017 at 12:00 AM
5 minute read
By John G. Browning
With the holidays approaching, Hollywood begins to trot out their “Oscar-bait” movies—those awards season contenders hoping to generate a buzz among those who select the nominees for the Academy Awards, Golden Globes, and other cinematic accolades. But what about the legal world? Don't we deserve our own laurels for those “you just can't make this stuff up” episodes that livened up the legal system over the past year? I know the awards I'd hand out.
Let's begin with the “Judicial Honesty” award. This year's pick is Ninth Circuit Judge Jay Bybee, who bared his true feelings about dealing with the opinions of his brethren. In his July opinion in U.S. v. Martinez-Lopez, a complex sentencing case, Judge Bybee began as follows: “Bybee, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part, but frustrated with the whole endeavor.” Wow—tell us how you really feel, Judge Bybee. What's next, “Bybee Circuit Judge, concurring because the Supreme Court won't look at this one anyway?” Of course, if there were a category for “Painful Honesty,” Bybee may have some competition—David Bookstaver, the longtime communications director for New York's Office of Court Administration. In August, after denying to a reporter that his job responsibilities had been taken away, Bookstaver accidentally “butt-dialed” the same reporter later that day. The result was a four-minute-long voicemail of a conversation Bookstaver had with a colleague in which he admitted “the story's true. I'm not doing anything. I barely show up to work and I've been caught.” Not surprisingly, soon thereafter Bookstaver was fired from his $172,000 a year “no show” job.
Our next category is “Creativity in Getting Your Hearing Postponed.” Unfortunately, one contender took this subject way too far. Syracuse lawyer Jacqueline B. Jones really, really, wanted to avoid a hearing on sanctions against her in a civil case, so she called in a bomb threat to the day care center at the federal courthouse where the hearing was scheduled to take place. The ruse failed miserably: Judge David Peebles went ahead with the sanctions hearing in Jones' absence, and the bomb threat was traced back to Jones. Shortly, thereafter, Jones parted ways with the law firm she'd been working for, and in August she pleaded guilty to falsely reporting an accident, a charge that carries a possible sentence of up to a year in jail and a fine of up to $100,000. On a more positive note, let's give props to the assistant U.S. attorney in Tampa, Florida who requested a continuance of an August hearing because of the Aug. 21 solar eclipse. It seems a key government witness had pre-paid for a ticket to visit an area in the path of the totality. U.S. District Judge Steven Merryday seemed somewhat sympathetic, as he noted that a solar eclipse “understandably occupies a provocative and luminous place in history and in art,” and proceeded to cite not only historic eclipses of the past but also the eclipse reference in Carly Simon's 1972 hit “You're So Vain.” But ultimately, the judge decided against the continuance. Perhaps he had a “Total Eclipse of the Heart.” (Incidentally, Judge Merryday is no stranger to unusual continuance requests. In 2012, he denied an attorney's motion for continuance where the lawyer's “conflict” was participating in an Ernest Hemingway lookalike contest.)
Finally, we have our “Most Creative Tactics” category. Admittedly, this is a close one. Early contenders included a San Francisco pro se plaintiff in a municipal court case who requested—and got—the cost of a “pizza party” as part of the discovery sanctions she was awarded. This may be the only court order I've seen that lists “31.19 for a large cheese pizza and bread sticks” in it. There was also European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and its use of lighthearted postcards sent to fugitives on the run (one, addressed to an armed robbery suspect wanted in Cyprus, said “We are inviting you back to Aphrodite's island. The beach is full of oysters, pearls, and us waiting for you.”).
Ultimately, though, the award had to go to former radio host and financial adviser Dawn Bennett. Charged by the SEC with fraudulently raising $20 million in a Ponzi-like scheme (among other things, Bennett owed back rent to the Dallas Cowboys for a luxury suite at AT&T Stadium), Bennett had a rather novel defense strategy: voodoo. According to federal prosecutors, agents raiding Bennett's Maryland townhome found Mason jars bearing the initials of SEC lawyers. Inside the jars were beef tongues, as well as instructions for a “Beef Tongue Shut Up Hoodoo Spell,” that Bennett purportedly cast in hopes of paranormally silencing the SEC lawyers investigating her.
Voodoo: now there's something they didn't teach in law school.
John G. Browning is a shareholder at Passman & Jones in Dallas, where he handles a variety of civil litigation in state and federal courts.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
5 minute readFrom Hospital Bed to Legal Insights: Lessons in Life, Law, and Lawyering
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1SEC Sued for Failing to Reveal Records Involving Simpson Thacher Attorney
- 2Lawsuit accuses University of California of racial discrimination in admissions
- 3Data Breaches in UK Legal Sector Surge, According to ICO Data
- 4PayPal Faces New Round of Claims; This Time Alleging Its 'Honey' Browser Extension Cheated Consumers
- 5Fired NLRB Member Seeks Reinstatement, Challenges President's Removal Power
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250