Verdicts: Jury Awards Plaintiff Claiming Brain Injury Two Years After Crash
A woman who claimed a traumatic brain injury in an intersection collision recovered $135,375.
November 01, 2017 at 12:01 AM
4 minute read
Motor Vehicle Driver Awarded for Alleged Back and Neck Injuries
A driver who claimed neck and back injuries from a significant impact was awarded $24,584. Omar Rios was driving in Dallas when he was rear-ended by Anthony Davis. Rios claimed sprains and strains and a herniation/protrusion at L5-S1. He underwent physical therapy and chiropractic care for four months. He sought nearly $60,000 in damages. The defense argued that the treatment and charges were excessive; that Rios sustained, at most, a mild soft-tissue strain that resolved by the end of his treatment; that up to six visits over three weeks would have been reasonable and necessary; and that the MRIs were not indicated, in part because there were no objective signs of radiculopathy. Rios v. Davis, No. CC-15-03702-E, D Court: Dallas County Court at Law No. 5 Plaintiff Attorney: Damon Mathias, Mathias Raphael PLLC, Dallas Defense Attorney: John M. Fowler, Lauren S. Shaw & Associates, Addison
|Jury Awards Man Hit in Parked Car
A man who was eating lunch in a parked car was awarded $1,471 on his claim that he injured his back and neck. Jose Vallejo was in a parked pickup truck that was hit by a camper towed by Amir Semenoff. Vallejo claimed neck and back sprains and strains; a 2- to 3-millimeter lumbar herniation; hypolordosis; cervical trigger points, suboccipital neuritis and facet syndrome; and right knee pain. Defense counsel argued that the impact was minor and the treatment was excessive and unreasonably expensive. Defense counsel asked the jury to do whatever it thought was right. Vallejo v. Newton, No. DC-15-00823 Court: 193rd Dallas County District Court Plaintiff Attorney: Samantha Sabroski, Ben Abbott & Associates, Garland Defense Attorney: John W. Stilwell, Law Office of John Stilwell, Plano
|Jury Awards Plaintiff Claiming Brain Injury Two Years After Crash
A woman who claimed a traumatic brain injury in an intersection collision recovered $135,375. Elise Mahoney was struck by Nicole Rapp on Custer Road at Towne Hill Crossing in Frisco. Rapp was making a left turn when she hit Mahoney, who was oncoming. Maloney was diagnosed with the brain injury almost two years after the accident. Her treating neuropsychologist testified that the window of opportunity for her to receive treatment had closed and that she would live with the effects of the brain injury for the rest of her life. The jury found Rapp 95 percent negligent and Maloney 5 percent negligent, which reduced its $142,500 award. Maloney v. Rapp, No. 429-128-2016 Court: 429th Collin County District Court Plaintiff Attorney: Mark D. Frenkel, Frenkel & Frenkel, Dallas Defense Attorney: Mike H. Bassett, The Bassett Firm, Dallas
|Plaintiff Mostly at Fault, Jury Finds
A driver who fractured his sternum in an intersection collision was mostly to blame, a jury found. George Riggs collided with Marcelino Hernandez in Dallas. The stoplights at the intersection were disabled because of a recent storm. Riggs sued Hernandez for negligently failing to keep a proper lookout. Riggs said he waited for his turn before proceeding and was almost all the way through the intersection when Hernandez hit him. An independent eyewitness testified that Hernandez entered the intersection first; that Riggs was speeding; and that Hernandez could not have done anything to avoid the accident. The jury found Riggs 85 percent negligent and Hernandez 15 percent negligent. Riggs v. Hernandez, No. CC-15-04343-B Court: Dallas County Court at Law No. 2 Plaintiff Attorney: Susan Anne Allen, Law Office of Susan Anne Allen, Dallas Defense Attorneys: Melanie M. Clark and Janet Strong, Trina T. Wilson & Associates, Richardson
|Motorcyclist's Fatal Crash Results in $2.1M Settlement
The family of a motorcyclist who was killed in a crash with a sedan while he was speeding agreed to a $2.1 million settlement. Kyle Frisbie, 24, hit an employee of Dahill Office Technology Co., and his mother and common law wife sued the company. The defense argued that Frisbie was contributorily negligent for speeding 10 mph over the 50-mph speed limit. The Dahill employee was also killed in the accident. Frisbie, who was wearing a helmet, sustained blunt-force injuries and died at the scene. Plaintiffs' counsel noted that the car's crash data recorder showed that the Dahill driver did not stop before exiting a driveway right before impact. Estate of Frisbie v. Dahill Office Technology Corp., No. C-1-PB-17-001338 Court: Travis County Probate Court No. 1 Plaintiff Attorneys: Lenore Rae Shefman and Daniel J. Curtin Jr., Shefman Law Group/CyclistLaw, Austin; Stephen Nagle, Stephen Nagle & Associates, Austin Defense Attorney: Bret L. Walton, David Klosterboer & Associates, San Antonio
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Hawk Tuah Girl’ $440 Million Meme Coin Collapse Sparks Legal Battle
4 minute readAn AI Danger to Minors: Two Texas Families Want to Shut Down Character.AI
4 minute readArt of the Settlement: Trump Attorney Reveals Strategy in ABC Lawsuit
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250