Holiday Party Disasters and How to Avoid Them
Holiday parties can build morale and team spirit; they also can create legal liability disasters for employers.
November 03, 2017 at 03:47 PM
14 minute read
Photo by iStockphoto/4FR
As companies recover from the Great Recession, holiday parties are no longer in danger of becoming extinct. In 2012 the Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM) found that almost three-quarters of employers planned to hold a holiday event, compared to 60 percent doing so just two years before. Holiday parties can build morale and team spirit; they also can create legal liability disasters for employers. Here are three categories of disasters to beware of, and solutions to address them proactively.
Sexual Harassment Disasters
When alcohol is served at holiday parties, it can create an environment for unwanted sexual advances and potentially illegal employee conduct. It is not uncommon for some employees to forget their office behavior standards at company holiday parties, particularly those held outside of the workplace. In a social setting, an employee may feel more at ease in pursuing another employee in a personal, romantic manner. And with ubiquitous cellphone use combined with social media postings, the evidence of a sexual harassment incident can be posted online for the whole world to see. A starting point for dealing with the latter concern is to review the company social media policy and prohibit employees from posting photographs or video at an official company function without management permission.
This, however, does not address the broader issue legal liability from harassment. Employees are protected from sexual harassment and discrimination by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which covers employers having 15 or more employees. Title VII provides two requirements for conduct to trigger liability for unlawful harassment: (1) the conduct must be unwelcome; and (2) the conduct must be sufficiently severe or pervasive that it violates the law.
Conduct is not illegal simply because it is inappropriate or makes someone feel uncomfortable. To violate Title VII, the conduct at issue must be severe or pervasive; it need not be both. Even a single, extremely serious incident of harassment may be sufficient to constitute a Title VII violation, especially if the harassment is physical. So, if the office party incident follows previous incidents of misconduct, it could constitute the evidence necessary to reach the “severe” or “pervasive” threshold, or at least create an issue for trial. Given this risk, employers should have in place comprehensive, written anti-harassment policies, clearly spelled out in employee handbooks—and re-circulate copies of these policies prior to the party. Also, send a memo reminding employees to act responsibly at the party, clearly expressing a lack of tolerance for inappropriate behavior. Courts have ruled that employers who make prompt and appropriate response to employee complaints can limit liability for sexual harassment by their employees.
Personnel Policy Disasters
Human resource issues that frequently arise at year-end can create the potential for conflict or confrontation at holiday parties from disgruntled employees if there is no proactive planning for situations that can arise. If this produces physical confrontation or violence, the employer faces legal liability. Be alert to the implications of these situations:
- Year-end bonuses may create the temptation for employees at holiday parties to compare notes on who got what and how much. It is against federal law to prohibit employees from discussing wages, but a reminder about professional confidentiality when a bonus is given may be helpful.
- As the fiscal year ends, companies can find it necessary to make budget cuts and, unfortunately, layoffs. There is never a good time to tell someone they are being terminated, but it can be even harder around the holidays, particularly if employees otherwise expected to attend a holiday function. They may show up anyway, even if terminated, and create disruption. Any severance announcement to an employee should specify the terms under which their company access is ended, and security should be present at the holiday function to screen and intercept potentially hostile terminated employees.
- The year-end holidays are a time of religious observance for Christians and Jews, and some such persons may openly resent and criticize a holiday function that lacks religious overtones. Similarly, many people who do not have religious affiliation can resent religious displays at such a function. Courts have held that wreaths and Christmas trees are considered “secular” symbols and can be displayed even if persons object. Remember, however, that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act requires an employer to reasonably accommodate an employee's religious observances, practices and beliefs, as long as it can do so without undue hardship on the employer's business operations—including at a holiday party.
- The holidays are the hardest time of the year for persons with depression or other mental illnesses, and such individuals may try to attend a holiday party, with disastrous results. Be sure to remind employees that the company has an employee assistance program available for individuals who are stressed out because of the holidays or just need someone to talk to.
Accident Liability Disasters
In a 2013 decision, a California appellate court reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment for the employer and found that an employee who consumed alcohol at a company-sponsored event and, after leaving, struck another car and killed the driver created liability for the employer. “It is irrelevant that foreseeable effects of the employee's negligent conduct (here, the car accident) occurred at a time the employee was no longer acting within the scope of his or her employment,” the court ruled. Given this significant liability potential, employers should take these proactive steps to keep alcohol from contributing to traffic accident disasters:
- If alcohol is served, keep consumption in check. Limiting access to alcohol by placing restrictions on the type served, the time available (such as by closing the bar well before the party ends), or the number of drinks served (such as through drink tickets) to prevent excessive drinking. Providing food typically slows the absorption of alcohol into the bloodstream, and providing plenty of non-alcoholic beverages is always a wise choice.
- Hire professional bartenders and require IDs from guests who do not appear to be 21 years of age or older. Ask the bartenders to keep their eyes open for obviously intoxicated employees.
- Arrange designated drivers or cabs to ensure that all persons have a safe way to get home. Consider offering incentives to employees who offer to be designated drivers and/or pre-paid cab vouchers to employees.
- Invite to the holiday party spouses, significant others, families and important clients with whom the company conducts business, which can keep the atmosphere of a company party more disciplined and discourage inappropriate behavior.
The bottom line, no matter what the potential disaster, is that effective, proactive steps, if properly planned and implemented, can be extremely valuable in defending an employer against holiday party problems and legal complaints.
David L. Barron is a member in the Houston office of the national law firm Cozen O'Connor, focusing his litigation practice on labor and employment law.
Photo by iStockphoto/4FR
As companies recover from the Great Recession, holiday parties are no longer in danger of becoming extinct. In 2012 the Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM) found that almost three-quarters of employers planned to hold a holiday event, compared to 60 percent doing so just two years before. Holiday parties can build morale and team spirit; they also can create legal liability disasters for employers. Here are three categories of disasters to beware of, and solutions to address them proactively.
Sexual Harassment Disasters
When alcohol is served at holiday parties, it can create an environment for unwanted sexual advances and potentially illegal employee conduct. It is not uncommon for some employees to forget their office behavior standards at company holiday parties, particularly those held outside of the workplace. In a social setting, an employee may feel more at ease in pursuing another employee in a personal, romantic manner. And with ubiquitous cellphone use combined with social media postings, the evidence of a sexual harassment incident can be posted online for the whole world to see. A starting point for dealing with the latter concern is to review the company social media policy and prohibit employees from posting photographs or video at an official company function without management permission.
This, however, does not address the broader issue legal liability from harassment. Employees are protected from sexual harassment and discrimination by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which covers employers having 15 or more employees. Title VII provides two requirements for conduct to trigger liability for unlawful harassment: (1) the conduct must be unwelcome; and (2) the conduct must be sufficiently severe or pervasive that it violates the law.
Conduct is not illegal simply because it is inappropriate or makes someone feel uncomfortable. To violate Title VII, the conduct at issue must be severe or pervasive; it need not be both. Even a single, extremely serious incident of harassment may be sufficient to constitute a Title VII violation, especially if the harassment is physical. So, if the office party incident follows previous incidents of misconduct, it could constitute the evidence necessary to reach the “severe” or “pervasive” threshold, or at least create an issue for trial. Given this risk, employers should have in place comprehensive, written anti-harassment policies, clearly spelled out in employee handbooks—and re-circulate copies of these policies prior to the party. Also, send a memo reminding employees to act responsibly at the party, clearly expressing a lack of tolerance for inappropriate behavior. Courts have ruled that employers who make prompt and appropriate response to employee complaints can limit liability for sexual harassment by their employees.
Personnel Policy Disasters
Human resource issues that frequently arise at year-end can create the potential for conflict or confrontation at holiday parties from disgruntled employees if there is no proactive planning for situations that can arise. If this produces physical confrontation or violence, the employer faces legal liability. Be alert to the implications of these situations:
- Year-end bonuses may create the temptation for employees at holiday parties to compare notes on who got what and how much. It is against federal law to prohibit employees from discussing wages, but a reminder about professional confidentiality when a bonus is given may be helpful.
- As the fiscal year ends, companies can find it necessary to make budget cuts and, unfortunately, layoffs. There is never a good time to tell someone they are being terminated, but it can be even harder around the holidays, particularly if employees otherwise expected to attend a holiday function. They may show up anyway, even if terminated, and create disruption. Any severance announcement to an employee should specify the terms under which their company access is ended, and security should be present at the holiday function to screen and intercept potentially hostile terminated employees.
- The year-end holidays are a time of religious observance for Christians and Jews, and some such persons may openly resent and criticize a holiday function that lacks religious overtones. Similarly, many people who do not have religious affiliation can resent religious displays at such a function. Courts have held that wreaths and Christmas trees are considered “secular” symbols and can be displayed even if persons object. Remember, however, that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act requires an employer to reasonably accommodate an employee's religious observances, practices and beliefs, as long as it can do so without undue hardship on the employer's business operations—including at a holiday party.
- The holidays are the hardest time of the year for persons with depression or other mental illnesses, and such individuals may try to attend a holiday party, with disastrous results. Be sure to remind employees that the company has an employee assistance program available for individuals who are stressed out because of the holidays or just need someone to talk to.
Accident Liability Disasters
In a 2013 decision, a California appellate court reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment for the employer and found that an employee who consumed alcohol at a company-sponsored event and, after leaving, struck another car and killed the driver created liability for the employer. “It is irrelevant that foreseeable effects of the employee's negligent conduct (here, the car accident) occurred at a time the employee was no longer acting within the scope of his or her employment,” the court ruled. Given this significant liability potential, employers should take these proactive steps to keep alcohol from contributing to traffic accident disasters:
- If alcohol is served, keep consumption in check. Limiting access to alcohol by placing restrictions on the type served, the time available (such as by closing the bar well before the party ends), or the number of drinks served (such as through drink tickets) to prevent excessive drinking. Providing food typically slows the absorption of alcohol into the bloodstream, and providing plenty of non-alcoholic beverages is always a wise choice.
- Hire professional bartenders and require IDs from guests who do not appear to be 21 years of age or older. Ask the bartenders to keep their eyes open for obviously intoxicated employees.
- Arrange designated drivers or cabs to ensure that all persons have a safe way to get home. Consider offering incentives to employees who offer to be designated drivers and/or pre-paid cab vouchers to employees.
- Invite to the holiday party spouses, significant others, families and important clients with whom the company conducts business, which can keep the atmosphere of a company party more disciplined and discourage inappropriate behavior.
The bottom line, no matter what the potential disaster, is that effective, proactive steps, if properly planned and implemented, can be extremely valuable in defending an employer against holiday party problems and legal complaints.
David L. Barron is a member in the Houston office of the national law firm
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Narcissist’s Dilemma: Balancing Power and Inadequacy in Family Law
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1On the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
- 2Review of Ex-parte orders by the Appellate Division
- 3'Confusion Where Previously There Was Clarity': NJ Supreme Court Should Void Referral Fee Ethics Opinion
- 4How Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
- 5Pa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250