Buzbee Accuses Louisiana Lawyers of Interfering with Potential $10 Million Fee
With a hard-charging reputation for winning millions in damages for plaintiffs in civil cases, Tony Buzbee isn't often fired once he's agreed to…
November 14, 2017 at 10:34 AM
4 minute read
Photo: Tom Callins
With a hard-charging reputation for winning millions in damages for plaintiffs in civil cases, Tony Buzbee isn't often fired once he's agreed to represent a client.
But that's exactly what Erika Morrison decided to do last week — just days after hiring the high-profile Houston attorney to handle a wrongful death suit involving her husband who was killed in an October oil rig explosion.
And the abrupt termination has prompted Buzbee to sue a family friend of Morrison's and three unnamed Louisiana attorneys in a Houston state district court alleging they all interfered with his attorney contract in the case, one Buzbee alleges could have “easily” earned him $10 million in fees.
According to Buzbee's petition in Buzbee v. Cox, Tim Morrison was killed on Oct. 15 while working on an oil and gas storage rig in Louisiana. Erika Morrison wanted to meet with Buzbee about her husband's death and the lawyer agreed to meet Morrison at his Houston residence on Nov. 5 to discuss the case.
After an hourlong meeting, Morrison hired Buzbee and directed him to file a petition in the case the following day, Nov. 6. Buzbee and his firm complied by filing a wrongful death action against two Houston companies.
But later that same afternoon after the case had been filed, Morrison informed Buzbee she wanted to put the case “on hold” because family friend Brad Cox wanted to introduce her to three other lawyers from Louisiana. Morrison allegedly terminated the contract she had with Buzbee via email without cause.
After Morrison terminated her contract with Buzbee, the Houston Chronicle reported that Buzbee had apparently sued the wrong companies in Morrison's case — one company didn't seem to exist and another allegedly had no connection to the rig or the rig's owner.
In an interview, Buzbee explained that he relied on Tim Morrison's coworkers and one official in Louisiana before filing the wrongful death case against the two defendants.
“The client was insistent on getting a case on file ASAP, which we did. It has been reported that the wrong defendants were sued, which, as you know, happens in this business,” Buzbee said. “We would have corrected that immediately, but in the interim, we were terminated.”
Jack Jamison, a Dallas solo practitioner who said he has represented the Morrison family for years, said Buzbee's suit is “absolutely groundless.”
“There's plenty of reason to fire Buzbee — they sued the wrong defendants,” Jamison said.
Jamison said Cox was Tim Morrison's best friend and she wanted to consult with him before hiring Buzbee and his firm.
“She didn't want to do it. She tried to contact Brad Cox and was unable to reach him,” Jamison said, who alleges Morrison felt pressured to sign the contract with Buzbee. “Brad Cox had nothing to do with that termination. He didn't even know about it.”
“And we don't know what cause the explosion is,” Jamison added. “There was no reason to sue anybody yet.”
However, Buzbee notes that in Texas, clients can fire the attorneys for any time for any reason, but the attorney can still collect his fee if fired without cause.
“It is frustrating to me because this woman and her sister came to my house, and wanted to sign right away and wanted a lawsuit filed right away. Apparently immediately after she left, some man named Brad Cox, who purportedly is the deceased's friend, told her she shouldn't have signed and that he had a meeting planned with other lawyers for her the next day. That's really all we know,” Buzbee said.
“We think the law is pretty clear in our favor, but we don't want to do anything to damage Mrs. Morrison's case,” Buzbee said.
“She has been through enough; but, at the same time, I'm not going to have a Louisiana lawyer come over to Houston and steal cases from me,” he added. “I think anyone would agree that the best chance she and her children have for a successful result in her case is with my firm. My record speaks for itself.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllVinson & Elkins: Traditional Energy Practice Meets Energy Transition
4 minute readNew Mexico Levies Record $48M Emissions Fine Against Natural Gas Giant
11 Red State AGs Demand Damages in Antitrust Lawsuit Shaming ESG Climate Investors
3 minute readTexas Supreme Court to Review "Implied" Performance Controversy in Oil-Gas Leases
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 2'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 3Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 4Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 5Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250