Texas Businessman Sues Houston Lawyer, Firms, Alleging They Mishandled Lawsuit
Stephen Morrow filed a negligence suit against Houston lawyer Kevin Hood and two firms, alleging they mishandled a negligence suit Morrow filed against another Houston firm.
November 14, 2017 at 11:42 AM
3 minute read
A Houston-area businessman filed a negligence suit against Houston lawyer Kevin Hood and his current and former firms, alleging they failed to properly handle a negligence suit filed against the now-shuttered firm Beirne, Maynard & Parsons.
Stephen Morrow, who lives in Montgomery County, seeks more than $1 million in damages from Hood and Houston's Hughes, Arrell & Kinchen in the petition he filed on Nov. 10 in state district court in Harris County. Morrow also names Fabrega Hood of Houston as a defendant.
Hood declined to comment, saying he had not read the petition. He said he practiced at Fabrega Hood before Hughes Arrell. Hood is not listed on the Hughes Arrell website but his State Bar of Texas listing identifies him as a lawyer at Hughes Arrell.
Hughes Arrell partner Mark Hughes declined to comment on the suit.
Morrow alleges that he was a partner in Cypresswood Land Partners in April 2007 when it was put into bankruptcy. At that time, Beirne, Maynard & Parsons, a Houston firm that dissolved in 2016, represented him and the company in bankruptcy court, he says.
He also alleges that after another Houston firm began representing them in bankruptcy court, Beirne Maynard filed a final fee application. In response to that application and on his own motion, Morrow says that the bankruptcy judge issued an order finding Beirne Maynard “had breached their fiduciary duties” to him and Cypresswood and ordered the firm to disgorge fees.
Morrow alleges Beirne Maynard paid back fees to Cypresswood but appealed the order on the disgorgement of fees he had paid. He alleges that a district court ruled that the bankruptcy court had no jurisdiction to order disgorgement of his fees because he was not a party to the bankruptcy.
Morrow says he then hired the defendants to prosecute legal malpractice claims against Beirne Maynard. The defendants filed a negligence suit against Beirne Maynard in 2014, but the judge ultimately granted Beirne Maynard's motion for summary judgment. Morrow alleges that before the judge ruled on the motion for summary judgment, the defendants failed to inform him during a mediation of a significant offer made by Beirne Maynard.
“Therefore, it has become necessary to bring this suit to collect a legal debt of money damages owing to plaintiff due to the defendants' actions,” Morrow alleges in the petition.
Morrow brings a negligence cause of action against the defendants, He alleges the firms are vicariously liable for all of Hood's acts, omissions and conduct because at all material times he was a member of Fabrega Hood or Hughes Arrell.
In requests for disclosure in the petition, Morrow seeks documents relating to the merger of Fabrega & Hood and Hughes Arrell, and documents related to the “windup” of Fabrega Hood.
Plaintiff's attorney Brett Wagner, of Doherty Wagner of Houston, did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Year, New Am Law 100: Challenges Await These Newly Merged Law Firms
7 minute readBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readTrump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Uber Cannot Be Held Vicariously Liable for Driver's Alleged Negligent Conduct
- 2TikTok Law and TikTok Politics
- 3California Supreme Court Vacates Murder Conviction in Infant Abuse Case
- 4New York’s Proposed Legislation Restraining Transfer of Real Property
- 5Withers Hires Lawyers, Staff From LA Trusts and Estates Boutique
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250