Relatives of Nine Killed in Church Shooting File Wrongful Death Claims Against US Air Force
Joe and Claryce Holcombe, who lost their son and eight other family members in the deadly shooting at First Baptist Church of Sutherland Springs, Texas, have filed claims against the U.S. government.
November 28, 2017 at 06:36 PM
7 minute read
Ammons Law Firm of Houston has filed two wrongful death claims against the U.S. Air Force on behalf of a Floresville, Texas, couple who lost their son and eight other family members in the deadly Nov. 5 shooting at First Baptist Church of Sutherland Springs, Texas.
The claims were filed Monday on behalf of Joe and Claryce Holcombe, whose son, John Bryan “JB” Holcombe, was killed in the church shooting that left 26 dead and 20 others injured. The shooter was former U.S. Air Force Airman Devin Patrick Kelley, who took his own life after fleeing the scene.
The Holcombes allege in the claims, filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, that their son's death was caused in whole or part by institutional failures by the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Air Force. They allege the military agencies failed to report Kelley's pertinent criminal arrest, conviction and military discharge information to federal databases that would have prevented him from buying or owning firearms.
Joe Holcombe said they filed the claims to get the system fixed.
“This shouldn't have happened. It wouldn't have happened most likely if the Air Force had been doing its job,” he said.
Robert Ammons.Robert Ammons, founding partner of Ammons Law Firm, said he believes his clients are the first to file claims stemming from the church shooting.
According to the claims, which were filed separately by Joe and Claryce Holcombe, their son was shot in the back while walking to the church pulpit to lead the congregation in worship. He died on the floor of the church, where he was a member.
The Holcombes allege in “riders” to the claims that shooter Kelley was convicted in November 2012 of criminal charges during a general court-martial and was sentenced to a year in military jail. The Air Force failed to enter those charges, or Kelley's 2014 “bad conduct discharge,” into appropriate criminal databases, including the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Systems.
The Holcombes further allege that the failure of the Department of Defense and the Air Force to timely and accurately enter and/or report Kelley's criminal arrest and conviction into the appropriate database in November 2012 isn't the whole story. According to the complaint, a 2015 Inspector General report found that the U.S. military failed to report criminal convictions 31 percent of the time during a sample period from June 2010 to October 2012.
“Although the shooter undoubtedly 'pulled the trigger' that resulted in the injuries and death of JB Holcombe and others, the failures of the U.S. Air Force, and others, allowed the shooter to purchase, own and/or possess the semiautomatic rifle, ammunition and body armor he used, and it is these failures that were a proximate cause, in whole or in part, of the injuries and death of the decedent,” the claims state.
Ammons said that while his clients are seeking monetary damages, their primary reason for going after the government is to improve reporting to the federal databases.
“These databases are a safety net to protect all of us from criminals, from allowing criminals, felons, people convicted of violent crimes from getting their hands on guns,” Ammons said.
The Air Force has six months to respond to the claims. The Air Force can accept the claims, deny them, or do nothing. If after six months it does nothing, Ammons' clients can file a lawsuit in federal court, he said.
The Air Force's media relations office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Investigators work at the scene of a deadly shooting at the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas, on Nov. 5, 2017. (Photo: Jay Janner/Austin American-Statesman via AP)Ammons Law Firm of Houston has filed two wrongful death claims against the U.S. Air Force on behalf of a Floresville, Texas, couple who lost their son and eight other family members in the deadly Nov. 5 shooting at First Baptist Church of Sutherland Springs, Texas.
The claims were filed Monday on behalf of Joe and Claryce Holcombe, whose son, John Bryan “JB” Holcombe, was killed in the church shooting that left 26 dead and 20 others injured. The shooter was former U.S. Air Force Airman Devin Patrick Kelley, who took his own life after fleeing the scene.
The Holcombes allege in the claims, filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, that their son's death was caused in whole or part by institutional failures by the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Air Force. They allege the military agencies failed to report Kelley's pertinent criminal arrest, conviction and military discharge information to federal databases that would have prevented him from buying or owning firearms.
Joe Holcombe said they filed the claims to get the system fixed.
“This shouldn't have happened. It wouldn't have happened most likely if the Air Force had been doing its job,” he said.
Robert Ammons.Robert Ammons, founding partner of Ammons Law Firm, said he believes his clients are the first to file claims stemming from the church shooting.
According to the claims, which were filed separately by Joe and Claryce Holcombe, their son was shot in the back while walking to the church pulpit to lead the congregation in worship. He died on the floor of the church, where he was a member.
The Holcombes allege in “riders” to the claims that shooter Kelley was convicted in November 2012 of criminal charges during a general court-martial and was sentenced to a year in military jail. The Air Force failed to enter those charges, or Kelley's 2014 “bad conduct discharge,” into appropriate criminal databases, including the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Systems.
The Holcombes further allege that the failure of the Department of Defense and the Air Force to timely and accurately enter and/or report Kelley's criminal arrest and conviction into the appropriate database in November 2012 isn't the whole story. According to the complaint, a 2015 Inspector General report found that the U.S. military failed to report criminal convictions 31 percent of the time during a sample period from June 2010 to October 2012.
“Although the shooter undoubtedly 'pulled the trigger' that resulted in the injuries and death of JB Holcombe and others, the failures of the U.S. Air Force, and others, allowed the shooter to purchase, own and/or possess the semiautomatic rifle, ammunition and body armor he used, and it is these failures that were a proximate cause, in whole or in part, of the injuries and death of the decedent,” the claims state.
Ammons said that while his clients are seeking monetary damages, their primary reason for going after the government is to improve reporting to the federal databases.
“These databases are a safety net to protect all of us from criminals, from allowing criminals, felons, people convicted of violent crimes from getting their hands on guns,” Ammons said.
The Air Force has six months to respond to the claims. The Air Force can accept the claims, deny them, or do nothing. If after six months it does nothing, Ammons' clients can file a lawsuit in federal court, he said.
The Air Force's media relations office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSupreme Court Reinstates Corporate Disclosure Law Pending Challenge
Supreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
Trending Stories
- 1Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
- 5Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to a Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250