Careful: Your Refrigerator Might Be Listening (Think IoT)!
Our mobile phones and tablets serve as jukeboxes, video arcades, personal assistants and encyclopedias, and we can get an answer to almost any question by simply saying, “Hey Siri” (or “Hey Alexa” or “Hey Genie”).
December 01, 2017 at 12:00 AM
7 minute read
No doubt about it — we live in an internet-connected world. Our mobile phones and tablets serve as jukeboxes, video arcades, personal assistants and encyclopedias, and we can get an answer to almost any question by simply saying, “Hey Siri” (or “Hey Alexa” or “Hey Genie”). It is indeed a Golden Age of technology, whether we like it or not.
It does not stop there. Over the last five years, the “Internet of Things” (or IoT—the term used to describe the ever-growing collection of physical objects connected to the Internet) has grown substantially. We have more “smart” devices in our homes, offices, cars, and on our persons, and these IoT devices can do everything from regulating the temperature in the bedroom to helping us avoid local traffic jams to letting us know we're out of beets (we must remember to somehow disable that last function).
By the year 2020, it is estimated that there will be approximately 50 billion IoT devices connected to the internet—between 6 and 7 IoT devices for every person in the entire world.
What about security of IoT? Yet this internet explosion of convenience and technology has raised new concerns about just how secure we are when it comes to the protection of our personal information. If you think that the title of this article sounds like something out of a dystopian science fiction thriller, guess again.
Day in and day out, we are treated to constant headlines telling us that yet another company has been hacked and their repositories of personal information compromised, and IoT hacks are no exception. Although IoT hacks have not received as much attention as the more straightforward computer hacks and thefts of credit card information, in 2017 the following products came on our radar:
• Baby Monitors—Ever wondered if there was an IoT device that would let you keep an eye (and an ear) on your baby anywhere and anytime without the hassles associated with bulky receivers? Bring on the internet-connected baby monitor! this IoT technology lets you check in on your baby from any room in the house, or even the car or the office, through an app on your mobile phone or tablet. Some versions even let you talk back to the baby, so you can whisper the baby back to sleep. Yet the IoT connectivity means that pranksters, voyeurs and plain old criminals can potentially listen in to whatever is being said, download video footage of your baby and sell this personal information online (and you know someone has already found a way to monetize this data). So much for “sleep tight.”
• Implantable Cardiac Devices—The FDA confirmed that St. Jude Medical's implantable cardiac IoT devices (things like pacemakers and defibrillators) have vulnerabilities that could allow a hacker to access it. For example, once implanted, hackers could deplete the battery or administer incorrect pacing or shocks. If you saw Damien Lewis do this on an episode of Homeland back in 2012 and thought this could never happen for real, oh how wrong you were!
• Sex Toys—Yeah. We went there. We're not exactly sure why anyone would actually want an IoT device that could monitor certain “aspects” of your sexual activity and then store that information for later analysis, but it has garnered at least some popularity. Yet these types of IoT are apparently relatively easy to hack, and you can imagine the embarrassment if someone other than the purchaser was able to turn the IoT device on at any time or control things like speed or power. We'll let you fill in the blanks. … sorry we even brought up the subject.
What can you do to protect your IoT? We could add to the list, but you get the idea. Every IoT device that is connected to the internet has the potential to be hacked, and the data stored within it appropriated and used against you. Yet just because these IoT devices can be hacked, it is not a foregone conclusion that your particular IoT device will be hacked or that you should revert back to the (relative) Dark Ages of 2000 when you actually used mobile phones to just call people.
There are some things that consumers can do to protect themselves.
1. Firmware Updates—The firmware is the software within an IoT device that makes it run, and IoT device manufacturers do their best (usually) to identify any security flaws in their products and publish updates on their website to eliminate them. Check the website regularly, at least once a week to see if there are any such updates, and if there are, update the IoT device right away.
2. Strong Passwords— Often, your IoT device will come straight from the factory with a pre-loaded password (something along the lines of — and I swear we are not making this up—“password” or the name of the company that made the IoT device). Change the factory set password right away to something that is relatively easy for you to remember, yet hard for a total stranger to guess or secure through trial and error.
3. Local Connectivity—With something like a baby monitor, while it might be really cool to be able to check in on your baby while you are at work, that means connecting to the monitor over the internet as opposed to the local area network in your home. Of course your local area network in your home is much more secure and much less likely to be hacked, so if you do not need global accessibility to your infant, consider implementing this kind of restriction; and
4. Product Reviews—Just as you might read reviews from trusted sources like Consumer Reports for any IoT device that you are thinking of purchasing, so you can consider things like safety and functionality, look for reviews about how secure the IoT devices are when it comes to the protection of personal data. Given how serious this issue has become, most tech-oriented companies are looking to use information security as a USP for their IoT device, so the information is definitely out there (and if it is not, maybe don't go with that brand).
Conclusions Obviously, neither IoT devices nor the potential hacks associated with them are going away anytime soon. If you want to take advantage of all the latest technological trends, take every step possible to secure the information that IoT devices will invariably collect. With a little common sense and foresight, your refrigerator can go from being an evil surveillance IoT device to a trusted monitor of beet inventory in no time!
Eric Levy is a senior attorney at Gardere Wynne Sewell focusing on transactional and compliance matters related to information privacy and security. Eric has received the Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP-US) designation from the International Association of Privacy Professionals. Edward (Eddie) Block is a senior attorney at Gardere Wynne Sewell. Eddie has over 20 years of experience as an information security professional and holds numerous security certifications including Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP), Certified Information Privacy Manager (CIPM), and Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH). Peter Vogel is a trial partner at Gardere Wynne Sewell where he chairs the Internet, eCommerce & Technology Group, and co-chairs the Cybersecurity & Privacy Group. Peter holds a Master's in computer science, and has been an adjunct law professor at the Dedman School of Law for 30 years, including teaching courses on the law of e-commerce for 15 years.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNondisparagement Clauses in Divorce: Balancing Family Harmony and Free Speech
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Chief Judge Joins Panel Exploring Causes for Public's Eroding Faith in NY Legal System
- 2Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 3Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
- 4Trump Moves to Withdraw Applications to Halt Now-Completed Sentencing
- 5Trump's RTO Mandate May Have Some Gov't Lawyers Polishing Their Resumes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250