Even Women Who Can't Say #MeToo Have Been Negatively Impacted by Predatory Culture
Even for women who haven't been harassed or assaulted (which I am fortunate enough to be), there is a price to be paid for a culture that denigrates and objectifies women. Many women, even if they haven't been harassed or assaulted, know that they are most likely missing out on opportunities simply because they are women.
December 01, 2017 at 05:00 AM
4 minute read
The #MeToo movement has opened the floodgates of women (and some men) telling their own stories of sexual harassment and assault, both in the workplace and out. Like most catharses, it was a long time coming.
For those who have harbored shame or guilt over their own Harvey Weinstein-like encounters, the recent flood of stories from victims, both famous and non-famous, has to be somewhat comforting. Whether any of this will lead to real change is, of course, an open question. There is reason to be cynical, given the recent promotion and/or tolerance of alleged and even admitted sexual predators, but one can always hope.
Even for women who haven't been harassed or assaulted (which I am fortunate enough to be), there is a price to be paid for a culture that denigrates and objectifies women. Many women, even if they haven't been harassed or assaulted, know that they are most likely missing out on opportunities simply because they are women.
The legal profession is based on personal relationships. Most relationships require at least occasional face-to-face interaction. In many cases, those interactions are during golf or at sporting events. In others, they're over drinks, dinners and, as we learned in the Weinstein case, at hotels. I'm sure there are plenty of lawyers who still entertain clients at strip clubs.
To a greater or lesser extent, many women don't feel welcome or comfortable in those venues. Certainly, many women love playing golf and attending football games, but there's no denying that those outings weren't originally conceived to be gender-inclusive. As for one-on-ones over dinner, drinks or at hotels, many women might be reluctant to agree to or invite a male client to meet in such a setting, for fear the client might get the wrong idea. At the very least, the potential intimacy of the setting can set off alarm bells for women leery of being hit on. As for entertaining at strip clubs, that's not a gray area. There might as well be a “No Gurls Allowed” sign.
My point is, even if a woman hasn't felt the sting of assault or harassment, the air we breathe is thick with it. And it can have a chilling effect on women's business development efforts. It can hinder our ability to nurture relationships with colleagues and clients of the opposite sex—both of which can have a direct effect on our career advancement.
Can women overcome these barriers? Of course we can. We've been dancing backward and in high heels for decades. But it's another barrier we simply don't need. And it's a barrier our male colleagues don't have to overcome. Just as important, it's a barrier many of our male colleagues don't even know exists for women (which is also part of the problem).
Of course, business development initiatives don't have to be gender-specific, and many firms hold group business development events (retreats, theater or concert outings, happy hours, etc.). But, there's no denying that there's a place for one-on-ones, whether it's with other lawyers or with clients and prospective clients. But some women may be uncomfortable in those settings if a firm's or a company's culture tolerates, and even protects, sexual predators. If the #MeToo movement does nothing else, it may help men realize that women face challenges men never even have to think about. And those men should know that they are crucial players in the effort to improve the workplace for their female colleagues.
If they have behaved inappropriately themselves, they should now be under no illusions about the impact of their actions. If they have behaved appropriately but were silent when their male colleagues denigrated or harassed female co-workers, perhaps they will now be moved to speak up.
A social media hashtag isn't going to change behavior, but if it helps turn up the volume on a conversation that has until recently been in coded whispers, it's been a good use of our digital currency.
Kathleen J. Wu is a partner in Andrews Kurth Kenyon in Dallas. Her practice areas include real estate, finance and business transactions.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNondisparagement Clauses in Divorce: Balancing Family Harmony and Free Speech
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250