Long After Placement Fee Dispute Resolved, Houston Lawyer Leaves Holland & Knight
Dean Schaner, who was sued by a recruiting company over a fee connected to his move to Holland & Knight, is opening a solo practice. The reasons for the move, he says, are unrelated to the long-settled litigation.
December 13, 2017 at 02:23 PM
2 minute read
Houston labor and employment attorney Dean Schaner, who was sued by a recruiting company over a placement fee after he joined Holland & Knight in 2016, has left the Am Law 100 firm to open his own firm based out of his home in Bellaire, a city that is part of Metropolitan Area.
Schaner said he left Holland & Knight in late November and is temporarily practicing at Weinberg Law Firm in Houston until he opens Schaner Law Firm on Jan. 16, 2018.
Schaner said he decided to make the move to a solo practice he could run out of his home for family reasons. He also said he looks forward to handling employment litigation on both sides of the docket, after having spent 30 years on the defense side. And by practicing at his own firm, he can bill at a lower rate than at a large firm, he said.
Schaner said his departure from Holland & Knight is not linked to the breach of contract suit Cassidy Recruiting of Dallas filed against him in August 2016, alleging he used another recruiter to make a move to Holland & Knight's Houston's office despite promising to use the plaintiff's services. He denied the allegations and sought a declaratory judgment that no enforceable contract existed between the recruiting firm and him.
On Nov. 6, 2016, 234th District Judge Wesley Ward of Houston signed a joint motion to dismiss the order.
Schaner said he can't talk about the litigation. “All I can say is it was dismissed and that's that,” he said.
Nitin Sud, a solo practitioner in Bellaire who represented Cassidy Recruiting in Cassidy Recruiting v. Schaner, also declined to comment.
Bradley Hancock, executive partner at Holland & Knight's Houston office, did not immediately respond to a request for a comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEversheds Sutherland Adds Hunton Andrews Energy Lawyer With Cross-Border Experience
3 minute readEx-Marathon General Counsel Takes Legal Reins of Another Energy Company
After Nearly 2 Decades in the Role, Longtime Haynes and Boone General Counsel Passes the Baton
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Many LA County Law Firms Remain Open, Mobilize to Support Affected Employees Amid Historic Firestorm
- 2Stevens & Lee Names New Delaware Shareholder
- 3U.S. Supreme Court Denies Trump Effort to Halt Sentencing
- 4From CLO to President: Kevin Boon Takes the Helm at Mysten Labs
- 5How Law Schools Fared on California's July 2024 Bar Exam
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250