Houston-based Firm's Use of Private Plane for Regular Trips to California Makes National News
Patterson + Sheridan uses its plane to fly lawyers from Houston to California, where the cost of rent and lawyers is high. The firm says the plane saves it money.
December 14, 2017 at 03:48 PM
3 minute read
Todd Patterson
The Gulfstream G200 that intellectual property firm Patterson + Sheridan uses for frequent trips to California from the firm's headquarters in Houston has been mentioned in several news reports lately, to the mild dismay of founding partner Todd Patterson.
“We've seen some of that,” Patterson said about reports this month in the New York Times and Business Insider, and on a television station in the Bay Area. ”I'm a little nervous about that because we weren't trying to upset industries like commercial real estate.”
The Times story focused on the high cost of housing in California.
Patterson said he believes Patterson + Sheridan clients understand the firm uses a private plane to save money and not to be extravagant, but the fact that clients are noticing the news reports “makes me a little nervous.”
Patterson said the 75-lawyer firm opened its first office in the Bay Area in 2000 and has used a private plane to ferry lawyers to California for the last 10 to 12 years. The firm bought the used Gulfstream two years ago for close to $4 million, Patterson said. It is roomier than the Westwind l the firm previously owned, he said.
The firm has solid business reasons for flying a full plane of lawyers every three or four weeks to California, where the lawyers meet with clients and work out of the firm's office in San Jose, and its new office in San Diego, he said.
He said it fulfills the firm's goal of providing clients with great customer service. But using a private plane is also cost-effective, he said. Due to the cost of office space leases in California, and the salary levels needed to attract great lawyers in a high-cost area, it's a relative bargain for the firm to fly its Houston-based lawyers to California, even at a round trip cost that runs north of $1,000 for each of the nine individuals on the flight.
The lawyers are more productive because they work on client matters while on the three-hour flight to California, and the one-hour flight between San Diego and San Jose, Patterson said. They could not do sensitive work while on a commercial flight or while sitting in an airport, he said.
According to market information on Zillow, the average price of a residential rental in Houston is less than half of the price in San Jose or San Diego.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUvalde Shooting 'Fresh in Everyone's Mind:' Lone Dissenting Judge Disagrees with School's Disciplinary Decision Over Pellet Gun
State Attorney General Faces Federal Courtroom Test Over Crypto Mining Ban
4 minute read2 Federal Judges Rescind Senior Status After Trump Win. Might More Follow?
Midsize Texas Firm Kane Russell Takes Another Step Toward Second-Generation Leadership With New CFO
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Best Practices for Corporate Compliance Programs in an Era of Enhanced DOJ Scrutiny and Uncertainty
- 2Lawsuit Asks California Supreme Court to Expand Use of Electronic Case Recording
- 3Law Firms Are In a Strong Spot, But Their Continued 'Growth Mindset' Comes With Challenges
- 4Thursday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250