The True Faces of Immigration In the Wake of the Zarate Verdict
The not guilty verdict by a San Francisco jury Nov. 30, 2017, in the case of Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, the undocumented homeless Mexican immigrant accused…
February 01, 2018 at 12:00 AM
5 minute read
The not guilty verdict by a San Francisco jury Nov. 30, 2017, in the case of Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, the undocumented homeless Mexican immigrant accused of murdering Kate Steinle, has once again ignited the national discourse about immigration in our country. Of course, Zarate has come to be, for many, the symbol of illegal immigration.
We recently returned from a weeklong tour of duty at the nation's largest immigration detention center for women and children in Dilley,Texas. Working under the auspices of the CARA Family Detention Pro Bono Project, we spent a week as volunteers helping to prepare the women to meet/speak with an immigration judge as part of what is called a credible fear hearing.This hearing is the first step in the asylum process. In light of the outcry provoked by the acquittal of Zarate and our recent experiences in Dilley, it feels like an appropriate moment to offer another portrait of the population that has drawn such ire from a segment of our nation's population.
While we were there, we interviewed and counseled some 223 women—all of whom had been detained crossing the U.S./Mexico border. Many of them had committed no crime at all—they made no attempt to sneak across the border in the dead of night. Instead, they walked up, hands raised, asking our nation to consider them as asylum seekers—a longstanding and well-recognized lawful status in our country.
Many of us use the phrase “in search of a better life” when speaking about immigrants, but the truth of what we saw was even starker than that. The women that we interviewed came to Texas out of necessity. They were quite literally running for their lives. A few examples:
One woman we met lived a solidly middle-class life in her hometown in El Salvador until one day her life was shattered. While now divorced, she had been married to a local police chief deeply committed to ending gang violence in their town. Recently the police had arrested a local gang member and come across a video on his cellphone depicting the children and exhorting fellow gang members to bring the heads of our client's 12- and 10-year-old sons to him. This woman and her kids left that night, taking buses, walking through the desert for weeks, until they turned themselves in, hands raised, at the border.
Another representative example is that of a young Honduran woman who, following her high school graduation, moved to a more prominent town with her two young children and got a good job. She was doing well. For that very reason, the local gangs identified her as someone who might have money, and they kidnapped her one day when she was walking to work. Every day for one month, she was raped by her captors. Finally, she managed to escape, ran to get her children, and fled. She, too, ended up at the border, hands raised in surrender.
Time and time again, we heard stories of women who had set up their own businesses—selling tortillas or cakes or bottled water. The moment they started to eke out a living, the gangs would appear and demand a monthly “protection” payment. If the women refused to—or could not—pay, the price would be the murder of their children, or rape, or burning down their house.
And time and time again, we heard of how women endure terrible violence and choose to stay. If it were just them affected, they could manage, they felt. Until the moment the violence extended to their children. That was when these devoted mothers said “no more” and fled.
Imagine what it would take for you to pick up and leave everything you know: your extended family, your loved ones, your entire life. All that is ahead is a dangerous and uncertain journey by bus, by train, on foot through the desert, to a country where you don't speak the language and where your first experience is living in an overcrowded detention center, and you and your children are referred to by a number, as is the case at Dilley.
Regardless of how you might feel about the Zarate verdict, we cannot talk about the face of immigration without acknowledging the thousands of law-abiding women and children from Central America and elsewhere who come to this country in search of safety, security and opportunity. So when discussing how to address immigration, an issue that we can all acknowledge is complicated, let us not lose compassion and empathy for women like those that we encountered in south Texas.
Richard Klawiter is a partner and Jennifer Eldridge is an associate in the Chicago office of global law firm DLA Piper.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Virtue Begets Virtue': Tips for Practicing Law (and Living) Ethically
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250