The True Faces of Immigration In the Wake of the Zarate Verdict
The not guilty verdict by a San Francisco jury Nov. 30, 2017, in the case of Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, the undocumented homeless Mexican immigrant accused…
February 01, 2018 at 12:00 AM
5 minute read
The not guilty verdict by a San Francisco jury Nov. 30, 2017, in the case of Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, the undocumented homeless Mexican immigrant accused of murdering Kate Steinle, has once again ignited the national discourse about immigration in our country. Of course, Zarate has come to be, for many, the symbol of illegal immigration.
We recently returned from a weeklong tour of duty at the nation's largest immigration detention center for women and children in Dilley,Texas. Working under the auspices of the CARA Family Detention Pro Bono Project, we spent a week as volunteers helping to prepare the women to meet/speak with an immigration judge as part of what is called a credible fear hearing.This hearing is the first step in the asylum process. In light of the outcry provoked by the acquittal of Zarate and our recent experiences in Dilley, it feels like an appropriate moment to offer another portrait of the population that has drawn such ire from a segment of our nation's population.
While we were there, we interviewed and counseled some 223 women—all of whom had been detained crossing the U.S./Mexico border. Many of them had committed no crime at all—they made no attempt to sneak across the border in the dead of night. Instead, they walked up, hands raised, asking our nation to consider them as asylum seekers—a longstanding and well-recognized lawful status in our country.
Many of us use the phrase “in search of a better life” when speaking about immigrants, but the truth of what we saw was even starker than that. The women that we interviewed came to Texas out of necessity. They were quite literally running for their lives. A few examples:
One woman we met lived a solidly middle-class life in her hometown in El Salvador until one day her life was shattered. While now divorced, she had been married to a local police chief deeply committed to ending gang violence in their town. Recently the police had arrested a local gang member and come across a video on his cellphone depicting the children and exhorting fellow gang members to bring the heads of our client's 12- and 10-year-old sons to him. This woman and her kids left that night, taking buses, walking through the desert for weeks, until they turned themselves in, hands raised, at the border.
Another representative example is that of a young Honduran woman who, following her high school graduation, moved to a more prominent town with her two young children and got a good job. She was doing well. For that very reason, the local gangs identified her as someone who might have money, and they kidnapped her one day when she was walking to work. Every day for one month, she was raped by her captors. Finally, she managed to escape, ran to get her children, and fled. She, too, ended up at the border, hands raised in surrender.
Time and time again, we heard stories of women who had set up their own businesses—selling tortillas or cakes or bottled water. The moment they started to eke out a living, the gangs would appear and demand a monthly “protection” payment. If the women refused to—or could not—pay, the price would be the murder of their children, or rape, or burning down their house.
And time and time again, we heard of how women endure terrible violence and choose to stay. If it were just them affected, they could manage, they felt. Until the moment the violence extended to their children. That was when these devoted mothers said “no more” and fled.
Imagine what it would take for you to pick up and leave everything you know: your extended family, your loved ones, your entire life. All that is ahead is a dangerous and uncertain journey by bus, by train, on foot through the desert, to a country where you don't speak the language and where your first experience is living in an overcrowded detention center, and you and your children are referred to by a number, as is the case at Dilley.
Regardless of how you might feel about the Zarate verdict, we cannot talk about the face of immigration without acknowledging the thousands of law-abiding women and children from Central America and elsewhere who come to this country in search of safety, security and opportunity. So when discussing how to address immigration, an issue that we can all acknowledge is complicated, let us not lose compassion and empathy for women like those that we encountered in south Texas.
Richard Klawiter is a partner and Jennifer Eldridge is an associate in the Chicago office of global law firm DLA Piper.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNondisparagement Clauses in Divorce: Balancing Family Harmony and Free Speech
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 2Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 3Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firm's Innovation Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
- 4Trump's DOJ Files Lawsuit Seeking to Block $14B Tech Merger
- 5'No Retributive Actions,' Kash Patel Pledges if Confirmed to FBI
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250