Texas Firms Lagged in Revenue, Profit Growth in 2017, But Led in Cutting Expenses
The Texas region was the only one among 11 regions where firms reduced expenses in 2017, according to a new Citi Private Bank Law Firm Group report. But revenue, profit, and demand declined in the region, whereas they rose nationwide.
February 08, 2018 at 02:53 PM
4 minute read
John Wilmouth, senior client advisor, Citi Private Bank Law Firm Group.
While U.S. law firms saw an overall increase in revenue and profits of 4.5 percent in 2017 compared with 2016, those metrics declined in the Texas region in 2017, according to a new Citi Private Bank Law Firm Group report.
Revenue declined by 3.9 percent in the Texas region in 2017 compared with a 4 percent increase in 2016. John Wilmouth, senior client adviser in the law firm group, said 2016 was a strong year for the Texas region, so some of the revenue decline in 2017 is due to the comparison to a robust prior year. But, he also notes that in 2016, about 71 percent of the Texas firms in the report posted an increase in revenue, compared with only 50 percent of the firms in 2017.
On the profit side for the Texas region, net income declined by 8.9 percent and profits per partner dropped by 7.6 percent. Wilmouth points out that those statistics are in comparison with 2016, when the comparable numbers for the Texas region were up by 13 percent and 10.9 percent.
“Most of the [Texas] firms had a pretty good 2016. When you have a good year, sometimes it's hard to follow up with another good year,” he said.
More positively, Wilmouth said the Texas region reduced expenses by 0.1 percent in 2017 and was the only region among 11 nationwide to cut expenses. This marks the second consecutive year that the Texas region was the only one to post a decrease in expenses, he said.
“Part of it is that they kept their lawyer compensation expense growth to only 2.2 percent, which is lower than any region, and also reduced operating expenses,” Wilmouth said, noting that the Texas region also reduced headcount in 2017, which affected that lawyer compensation figure.
“One other thing I'd say that stood out to me in this, to some extent from the reduction in headcount, also for the second year in a row, is they were also able to improve productivity,” Wilmouth said. “They are managing to keep their lawyers busy.”
For the report, the law firm group surveyed 189 U.S. firms, including Am Law 100 firms, Second Hundred Firms, and 55 niche/boutique firms. The Texas region includes a “wide spectrum” of eight firms ranging from Am Law 50 firms to firms outside the Second Hundred, he said.
According to the report, 2017 was a strong year for U.S. firms due to increased demand, but growth in expenses and a longer collection cycle put a damper on profit growth. However, the law firm group expects a healthy start to 2018 because of strong year-end inventory.
Total demand in Texas in 2017 declined by 2.5 percent, while nationally, demand improved by 0.7 percent. Total demand is hours logged by qualified timekeepers, Wilmouth said.
In Texas, billing rates increased by 2.6 percent in Texas in 2017, which is less than the 3.7 percent increase seen nationally. Wilmouth said the Texas region lagged in that area primarily because the equity partner headcount declined by 1.4 percent during the year.
“You take some of those higher billers out, it would naturally reduce the overall dollar value of the work,” he said.
Forecasting 2018, Wilmouth said inventory levels may depress activity in the Texas region during the first quarter.
“Inventory at year end was up 3.1 percent, which was lower than 6.1 percent in the industry. It may be a little more difficult to come out of the starting gates this year because they don't have the inventory buildup,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSeyfarth Launches Energy Transactions Practice in Houston With Polsinelli Team
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250