Thompson & Knight Saw Net Income Improve, Gross Revenue Slip in 2017
Dallas-based Thompson & Knight cut expenses by $5 million in 2017, which contributed to the firm's 3.5 percent growth in net income for the year.
February 08, 2018 at 06:57 PM
3 minute read
Despite a sluggish start on the transactional side, net income in 2017 grew by 3.5 percent at Dallas-based Thompson & Knight when compared with 2016, although gross revenue slipped by 0.7 percent for the year.
“We were pretty pleased with the year overall,” said managing partner Mark Sloan. “The year started off a little slower on the transactional side, but we really picked up in the second half, corporate and real estate picked up on a good note, and trial stayed busy.”
The firm brought in $212,022,000 in revenue in 2017, up from $213,445,000 the year before. With a full-time equivalent of 280 lawyers, revenue per lawyer came in at $758,000, down 2.8 percent from $780,000 in 2016.
Net income improved to $92,748,000 in 2017, up 3.5 percent from $89,634,000 in 2016. With 97 equity partners on a full-time-equivalent basis, profits per partner hit $956,000, down 2.9 percent when compared with $985,000 last year.
In 2016, Thompson & Knight's gross revenue improved by 2.9 percent and net income was up by 3.5 percent, compared with 2015. This year, ALM is rounding gross revenue and net income to the nearest $1,000—a change from prior years, when those numbers were rounded to the nearest $500,000.
Sloan said the firm's 2017 financials were affected by the end of the Life Partners Holdings Chapter 11 restructuring, which “drove a good part of '15 and '16″ and provided a lot of work to the firm's bankruptcy, corporate, finance and tax lawyers. He said bankruptcy work was down in 2017, largely because many of the problems in the oil patch have been worked out, so fewer energy companies are filing for bankruptcy, and because the firm needed to reload its bankruptcy pipeline following the end of the big Life Partners matter.
Another contributor to flat growth in revenue was the firm's investment in contingency work that hasn't paid yet, including one judgment that is on appeal, Sloan said.
On the plus side, Sloan said intellectual property litigation picked up in 2017, and other areas that were busy last year include tax controversy and government/regulatory.
The firm did a good job on the expense side in 2017, Sloan said, which contributed to the increase in net income. He said expenses were about $5 million less in 2017 than in 2016—a development he said was due in part to lower health insurance claims, but also to everyone just watching spending.
Thompson & Knight isn't the only Texas firm that carefully watched expenses in 2017. According to a new report from Citi Private Bank Law Firm Group, expenses declined by 0.1 percent in the Texas region in 2017. It was the only region in the country to post a decline in expenses.
The firm's 280 FTE head count is up 2.6 percent compared with 273 in 2016, and the firm added a net of six equity partners to reach an FTE of 97.
Sloan said the firm is well-positioned for the future.
“We've got a good track record of stability. I think we've had some good increases in profits, RPL, the last several years,” he said. “It didn't go up last year, but I feel good where we are in the market. We will have opportunities.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSeyfarth Launches Energy Transactions Practice in Houston With Polsinelli Team
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250