Deadline Extended: Texas Lawyer Professional Excellence Awards Offer New Contests for Midsize and Small Firms
Our goal at Texas Lawyer and our parent company, ALM, is to serve the entire legal community.
February 12, 2018 at 02:04 PM
5 minute read
Our goal at Texas Lawyer and our parent company, ALM, is to serve the entire legal community. As part of that, we're adding new wrinkles to our annual Professional Excellence Awards to make sure we get a chance to highlight the great work and achievements across the full breadth of the Texas Lawyer legal community.
We have extended the deadline for all categories to May 15.
The changes will create level playing fields among litigation groups vying for awards and more opportunities for lawyers from midsize and small firms to be recognized.
ALM will produce a national awards event in which big firms—those with 200 or more lawyers anywhere in the country—will compete against their peers for litigation departments of the year honors. Details about those awards will be announced soon.
At the local level, Texas Lawyer will recognize litigation teams from midsize and small firms, and lawyers from any-sized firm will be considered for Attorney of the Year, On the Rise and Lifetime Achievement.
Listed below are the Professional Excellence contests held for Texas Lawyer. The winners will be recognized in the magazine, online and at an event in the fall.
Litigation Teams of the Year (Midsize: Texas-based firms with 50 to 199 lawyers), for these categories: General, IP, Energy and Appellate.
Litigation Teams of the Year (Small: Texas-based firms with 1 to 49 lawyers), for these categories: General, IP, Energy and Appellate.
CLICK HERE to download instructions for Litigation Team of the Year Midsize and Small Firms.
The following categories for Texas Lawyer Professional Excellence awards are open to lawyers from all sizes of firms and organizations:
Attorney of the Year: This award goes to the lawyer who in 2017 had the biggest impact on the law or the Texas legal community or did the most to advance the cause of justice. (To be sure, some of this work may have originated before 2017 and/or extended into 2018.) If you think someone deserves this recognition, please send an email essay, with the subject line “Texas Lawyer Attorney of the Year,” of up to 1,000 words to [email protected] by May 15, 2018.
Lifetime Achievement Awards: Please tell us in up to 1,000 words about anyone living who has left a lasting imprint on the Texas legal community. Nominations should be sent to [email protected], with the subject line “Texas Lawyer Lifetime Achievement Awards,” by May 15, 2018. Please include a high-resolution color photo of the nominee, at least 200 dpi.
On the Rise: Please tell us, in up to 1,000 words, about lawyers under the age of 40 who have wielded influence in their practice areas in Texas and beyond. They should be innovators, developing unique practice niches, amassing robust books of business, demonstrating strong leadership qualities, showing expertise in litigation, in-house or transactional work and committing themselves to pro bono, charitable and professional volunteer work. Nominees must have been born after June 1, 1978, to be eligible. Nominations should be sent to [email protected], with the subject line “Texas Lawyer On the Rise,” by May 15, 2018. Please include a high-resolution color photo of the nominee, at least 200 dpi.
The following categories for Texas Lawyer Professional Excellence awards are open to lawyers only from midsize and small firms and organizations (199 lawyers and under):
Best Mentors: This is a new category, designed to recognize lawyers who have helped less-experienced colleagues become better lawyers. The relationship between mentors and mentees need not be formal. Please tell us in up to 500 words about anyone who meets this (deliberately vague) criterion. Nominations should be sent to [email protected], with the subject line “Texas Lawyer Best Mentors,” by May 15, 2018. Please include a high-resolution color photo of the nominee, at least 200 dpi.
Top Women in IP (Ginger Rogers Award): This award goes to one woman who exemplifies doing “everything her male counterparts do but backwards and in heels.” Please tell us in up to 1,000 words about anyone who fits this description—making sure to include a link to the nominee's social media address. Nominations should be sent to [email protected], with the subject line “Texas Lawyer Top Women in IP,” by May 15, 2018. Please include a high-resolution color photo of the nominee, at least 200 dpi.
Most-Effective Deal-makers: Again, quantity or dollar volume are not the only criteria. These deal-makers get repeat business for how they achieve their clients' goals so that both sides sign on the dotted lines. Please tell us in up to 1,000 words about anyone who fits this description, using examples from 2017. Nominations should be sent to [email protected], with the subject line “Texas Lawyer Most-Effective Deal-makers,” by May 15, 2018. Please include a high-resolution color photo of the nominee, at least 200 dpi.
Unsung heroes: They weren't the lead lawyers on the matter, but you could not have won the case, done the deal or finished the project without them. Please tell us in up to 500 words about anyone who fits this description, using examples of what they did during 2017. Nominations should be sent to [email protected], with the subject line “Texas Lawyer Unsung Heroes,” by May 15, 2018. Please include a high-resolution color photo of the nominee, at least 200 dpi.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClimate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250