Jackson Walker Sees 10 Percent Drop in 2017 Net Income; Slight Increase in Gross Revenue
Revenue per lawyer and profits per partner also declined year-over-year. But in 2016, the firm posted extraordinary financial results.
February 15, 2018 at 04:16 PM
3 minute read
C. Wade Cooper, Jackson Walker.
After posting extraordinary results in 2016, Jackson Walker saw net income in 2017 drop by 10.6 percent on a slight increase in gross revenue.
The Dallas-based firm brought in $249,429,000 in gross revenue in 2017, compared with $246,647,000 in 2016, and $94,651,000 in net income—down from $105,882,000 the prior year.
Revenue per lawyer and profits per partner also declined. RPL was $694,000, down 2.5 percent from 2016's $712,000, and PPP was $942,00, down 13.7 percent when compared with $1,092,000 the prior year.
Wade Cooper, the firm's Austin-based managing partner, said 2017 financials were down largely because of the firm's extraordinary results in 2016, when the firm posted an 11.3 percent increase in gross revenue and a 26.2 percent hike in net income over 2015.
“We made a quantum leap in [2016] in terms of gross revenue, and we are very pleased that we beat that number again this year,” Cooper said. “So we feel like we've stepped up a notch and we did it different ways.”
In 2016, the firm's extraordinary financials were driven by strong performance in corporate and real estate and, particularly, in litigation, Cooper said. “This year, litigation wasn't the driver. It was continued growth and strength in our transactional areas,” he said, adding that 2017 was a year for “reloading” large litigation matters.
Cooper also said expenses were up some in 2017 because the firm invested in raises for associates, staff and nonequity partners and also for lateral hires. “We felt like we were creating the seeds for future success by investing,” he said.
The firm brought on 16 lateral partners in 2017, adding “skill sets” that Cooper said help the firm serve clients. Those lateral hires include six intellectual property partners in Houston from the IP boutique Williams Morgan and three lawyers from Hays & Owens, an energy regulatory and litigation boutique, who joined Jackson Walker's office in Austin.
Also, four partners moved to Jackson Walker offices from Andrews Kurth Kenyon, including a former federal prosecutor who launched a white-collar crime defense practice at the firm, and four laterals, including three partners, who joined the firm in San Antonio from Dykema Cox Smith.
Cooper said the firm will continue to aggressively seek out laterals. “With the turmoil in the marketplace, we are finding a lot of folks who believe our platform meets their needs in terms of lower cost, better profitability and a better culture,” he said.
The firm—the largest based only in Texas—is pursuing a regional strategy. Its offices are in Austin, Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston, San Angelo, San Antonio and Texarkana. The lawyer count grew a little in 2017, with a total of 359 lawyers—up 3.5 percent from 347 the year before.
Cooper said the firm continued to maintain a diverse base of clients in 2017, with only one client providing more than two percent of the firm's revenue.
While a number of other large Texas firms are currently engaged in merger negotiations, including Andrews Kurth; Gardere Wynne & Sewell; and Strasburger & Price, that's not under consideration at Jackson Walker, Cooper said. During recent strategic planning, he said, the firm's partners affirmed the decision to stay independent.
“Our folks are very comfortable with the direction we are headed,” Cooper said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSeyfarth Launches Energy Transactions Practice in Houston With Polsinelli Team
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 2Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
- 3'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
- 4Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
- 5These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250