Texas Courts Not Equipped to Deal With Mental Health Issues, Courts Find
The Texas criminal-justice system has been a default mental health services provider for many Texans, but courts don't have enough resources for the task, according to the state's two high courts.
February 15, 2018 at 05:09 PM
3 minute read
The Texas criminal justice system has been a default mental health services provider for many Texans, but courts don't have enough resources for the task, according to the state's two high courts.
That's one problem that the Texas Supreme Court and Court of Criminal Appeals aim to solve by joining together to create the Judicial Commission on Mental Health.
The highest levels of judicial leadership must act to improve the lives of defendants with mental health issues, said a Feb. 13 order establishing the commission.
“Courts and the justice system have a profound impact on mental health services,” the order said. “Courts must make life-altering decisions that require knowledge of multiple and complex issues.”
Previously, the Texas Judicial Counsel established a mental health committee to study the issue. It determined that Texas needed more resources to ensure that mental health professionals provide timely and complete mental health assessments; defendants have access to community mental health services; and there are available outpatient services, inpatient facilities and jail-based programs to provide competency restoration.
The previous committee found that dockets are so crowded that judges don't have enough time to consider a defendant's, child's or family's mental illness issues. The courts, mental health providers and attorneys have a lack of communication and coordination. Courts need better technology to manage their dockets and track cases involving mental health problems. Lawyers need training and fair compensation, while defendants need a voice in decisions affecting their lives.
The new joint commission will be developing, implementing and coordinating policies to improve how the courts interact with and administrate justice for children, adults and families who have mental health needs.
The 14-member commission will be co-chaired by Texas Supreme Court Justice Jeff Brown and Court of Criminal Appeals Judge Barbara Hervey, and include people from all levels of the judicial system, mental health foundations and other state and local leaders. There could be nonvoting members from other branches of the state government and perhaps an advisory council of experts in the broader mental health and judicial systems.
Eventually, the new commission will come out with a plan to strengthen the justice system's interaction with the state's mental health system. It will find ways for courts to more effectively reach good outcomes for Texans with mental illness, using best practices and methods based on data, evidence and outcomes. There's a goal to improve communication and collaboration between the courts and mental health system stakeholders. The commission is tasked with trying to increase resources and funding, and to promote judicial training about mental health.
Angela Morris is a freelance reporter. Follow her on Twitter at @AMorrisReports
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUber Not Responsible for Turning Over Information on 'Dangerous Riders' to Competitor, Judge Finds
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250