Lesbian Law Prof Sues Over Rejection as Foster Parent
Fatma Marouf, a professor at Texas A&M University School of Law, and her wife Bryn Esplin claim a Catholic child welfare charity turned them away because the couple didn't “mirror the Holy Family.”
February 21, 2018 at 02:21 PM
4 minute read
A Texas law professor and her wife tried becoming foster parents for refugee children, but a Catholic child welfare charity turned them away because the lesbian couple didn't “mirror the Holy Family,” said a new lawsuit.
Fatma Marouf, a professor at Texas A&M University School of Law, and her wife Bryn Esplin, a Texas A&M bioethics professor, were married in 2015 and attempted unsuccessfully to have a child through reproductive technology, their lawsuit said. They became interested in becoming foster parents for a refugee child and went through an application process with Catholic Charities of Fort Worth—an agency that Marouf knew about through her immigration law work as director of Texas A&M's Immigrant Rights Clinic.
Donna Springer, a board member for Catholic Charities, told them foster parents must “mirror the holy family,” and that they didn't qualify to foster a child, alleged the Feb. 20 complaint in Marouf v. Azar, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Marouf reported to the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement, which oversees refugee children welfare programs, that Catholic Charities had discriminated against her and her wife because they're a same-sex couple. She never heard back about what happened.
Now the couple is suing multiple federal officials and agencies responsible for the refugee children programs, and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, which subcontracts with Catholic Charities of Fort Worth, for violating their constitutional rights. The plaintiffs alleged that the government is using taxpayer dollars to unlawfully fund the Catholic nonprofits for services for unaccompanied refugee children, in a way that unlawfully discriminates against same-sex couples who want to be foster and adoptive parents.
“The organizations use religious doctrine regarding same-sex relationships to exclude such couples categorically from applying to be foster parents,” said the complaint.
Marouf didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Her attorney, Jessica Lynn Ellsworth of Hogan Lovells in Washington, D.C., declined to comment. The plaintiffs are also represented by the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund Inc.
Heather Reynolds, president and CEO of Catholic Charities of Fort Worth, didn't immediately respond to a call seeking comment.
The complaint noted that the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement runs welfare programs for unaccompanied refugee children, and it awards grants and enters cooperative agreements with child welfare organizations—some religious—to perform services for the children. However, the religious groups must abide by federal law, and the government must ensure that religious groups don't discriminate against foster parents based on sexual orientation or same-sex marriage.
The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops is one of the main groups that administers the refugee children programs, winning millions of dollars in grants each year. Its grant applications have said its services can't contradict the teachings of the Catholic Church. It makes sure its sub-grantees do the same. The federal government doesn't have safeguards to make sure the charities aren't administering grants based on religious considerations, said the complaint.
The charity openly advocates parenting by opposite-sex couples, and against parenting by same-sex couples, said the complaint. The government knows about the charity's disfavor of same-sex relationships, yet still awarded taxpayer dollars to it based on “impermissible religious criteria,” the complaint said.
“There is no valid basis for the government to prefer different-sex couples over same-sex couples when considering or approving would-be foster or adoptive parents or making placement or adoption decisions,” the complaint said. “Children reared by lesbian or gay parents are just as likely to be well-adjusted as children of heterosexual parents.”
Angela Morris is a freelance reporter. Follow her on Twitter at @AMorrisReports
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPartner Compensation, Billing Rates Are Trending Higher in Dallas Than Houston
3 minute readOn a Texas Growth Surge, Paul Hastings Signs New Leases in Houston, Dallas
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'When the Firm Needs Something Done, Raise Your Hand,' Says Eric Kennedy of Buchalter
- 2People in the News—Nov. 15, 2024—Lamb McErlane, Faye Riva, Stradley Ronon
- 3'A Template' for Religious Accommodation: Attorney Gives Insight to $12M Win Over Employer's COVID-19 Vaccination Policies
- 4Federal Judge Finds Neiman Marcus Liable in Personal Injury Suit for Unsecured 13-Pound Painting
- 5The New Hybrid Legal Professional: Equal Parts Law and Business
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250