Federal Jury Convicts Texas State Sen. Carlos Uresti on 11 Fraud-Related Counts
A federal jury has found state Sen. Carlos Uresti, a San Antonio lawyer, guilty on 11 felony fraud-related counts including steering his clients to invest in a hydraulic fracking business that turned out to be a Ponzi scheme.
February 22, 2018 at 04:02 PM
4 minute read
Texas Sen. Carlos Uresti, D-San Antonio. right, enters the federal courthouse for a hearing July 10, 2017, in San Antonio. (AP photo/Eric Gay)
A federal jury has found state Sen. Carlos Uresti, a San Antonio lawyer, guilty on 11 felony fraud-related counts including steering his clients to invest in a hydraulic fracking business that turned out to be a Ponzi scheme.
Uresti, a Democrat, was found guilty of wire fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering and securities fraud violations by helping develop and solicit investors for a now-defunct oilfield company called FourWinds Logistics where he served as general counsel.
The jury also found Gary Cain, a FourWinds consultant, guilty on nine similar charges while the company's former CEO, Stanley Bates, previously pleaded guilty to fraud charges last month.
During the month-long salacious trial, the prosecution's star witness was Denise Cantu, a former client of Uresti who told jurors the married lawyer helped her win a $900,000 settlement, slept with her, and convinced her to invest FourWinds—losing all but $100,000 of her investment. Prosecutors alleged Uresti, who was under financial strain, groomed Cantu before defrauding her.
“I trusted him a lot more,” she said, according to a report in the San Antonio Express-News. “That made him closer to me. He was my friend, my lover, I guess.”
Uresti could not be immediately reached for comment. He faces a lengthy prison sentence as each of the fraud-related convictions carry a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison while the money laundering charges carry a maximum of between five and 10 years. He is tentatively scheduled to be sentenced on June 25 before U.S. District Senior Judge David Ezra of the Western District of Texas.
John Bash, the U.S. attorney for the Western District of Texas whose office prosecuted Uresti, said the conviction proved that no person is above the law.
“Today's verdict powerfully reaffirms the core American belief in equal justice under law—a belief so important to our system of government that it is engraved on the front of the U.S. Supreme Court. No matter who you are, no matter your title or status or position in the community, you will be held accountable for your actions, particularly when you inflict harm on your fellow citizens,” Bash said. “I could not be prouder of this office's prosecution team and our law-enforcement partners in achieving justice for the victims of the fraudulent investment scheme at the heart of this case.”
Uresti was initially represented at trial by Mikal Watts, a San Antonio plaintiffs attorney who successfully defended himself pro se against federal allegations that he intentionally submitted phony names to recover from the 2010 BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill.
However, Watts was later disqualified from representing Uresti at trial because they had both represented Cantu in her civil settlement. Watts was later replaced by San Antonio criminal defense attorney Mike McCrum.
“I am devastated for my friend who spent an entire career as a dedicated public servant. He got into a business deal with the wrong guy,” said Watts, who attended the majority of Uresti's trial. “While I respectfully disagree with the jury's verdict, I also respect it and I will continue to stand by my friend as he goes through this unfortunate process.”
Watts expects Uresti will appeal the verdict.
“I got disqualified as Uresti's lawyer because one of his clients was a client of mine—a ruling I vehemently disagreed with but will be part of his appeal,'' Watts said of Uresti's next move.
“It's too early to get into that but, I believe there are multiple points on appeal that will put this verdict in jeopardy,” Watts said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTexas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
3 minute readSamsung Flooded With Galaxy Product Patent Lawsuits in Texas Federal Court
Haynes Boone, Hicks Thomas Get Dismissal of $1.3B Claims in 2022 Freeport LNG Terminal Explosion
3 minute readIn Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250