Texas Court OKs Strip Club's Plan to Arbitrate Claims of Dancer Who Lost Leg in Car Crash
A Texas court of appeals has allowed a Dallas topless bar to send a stripper's civil damage claims to arbitration after she lost a leg in a car accident…
February 27, 2018 at 03:02 PM
3 minute read
A Texas court of appeals has allowed a Dallas topless bar to send a stripper's civil damage claims to arbitration after she lost a leg in a car accident because the club allegedly allowed her to drive home drunk.
Joy Lantrip was working as an exotic dancer at Bucks Cabaret in 2016 when she suffered severe injuries in a single-car accident after leaving the club. Lantrip sued the club in a Dallas state district court for gross negligence and violations of the Texas Dram Shop Act for allowing her to leave its premises after she was served an excessive amount of alcohol. Lantrip also claimed in her petition that Bucks was negligent in requiring her to consume alcohol while at work.
In response to Lantrip's lawsuit, Bucks moved to compel arbitration citing a provision in a lease agreement she signed stating that any dispute arising from “working at the club” would be decided by binding arbitration. Lantrip contended that her claims were independent of the lease and outside the scope of arbitration because Bucks sold her alcohol, making her a patron. A trial court later denied the Bucks' motion to compel arbitration, a ruling the club appealed to Dallas' Fifth Court of Appeals.
In its decision in Bucks Cabaret v. Lantrip, the Fifth Court focused on whether Lantrip's claims that she was overserved alcohol while working at Bucks fell within the scope of the arbitration provision.
“Although Lantrip urges that she was a patron because Bucks sold her alcoholic beverages, the fact that she purchased drinks is not necessarily inconsistent with her working under the terms of the lease at the time,” wrote Justice Ada Brown. “Indeed, Bucks could not require Lantrip to purchase drinks if she were merely a patron.”
“Focusing not on her causes of action but the petition's factual allegations, including an allegation that Bucks required her to drink alcoholic beverages, and resolving any doubts in favor of arbitration, we conclude her claims fall squarely within the scope of the lease's arbitration provision,” Brown wrote.
“Because the lease's arbitration provision is a valid arbitration agreement and Lantrip's claims fell within the scope of that provision, the trial court abused its discretion in denying Bucks' motion to compel arbitration,” Brown concluded in the decision.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to asset-and-logo-licensing@alm.com. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSupreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
Overtime Rewind: Texas Court Ruling Unravels FLSA Salary Level Increases
4 minute readDivided 5th Circuit Shoots Down Nasdaq Diversity Rules
Uvalde Shooting 'Fresh in Everyone's Mind:' Lone Dissenting Judge Disagrees with School's Disciplinary Decision Over Pellet Gun
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250