Shearman & Sterling Opens Austin Office with Eight Lawyers from Andrews Kurth
The firm will also open an office in Houston in a few months.
March 01, 2018 at 11:00 AM
4 minute read
Austin, Texas.
Shearman & Sterling, which has been eyeing the Texas market for some time, launched its first Texas office in Austin Thursday, bringing on seven partners and a counsel from Andrews Kurth Keynon.
The eight new Shearman hires all focus on advising emerging growth companies in the technology life sciences, and media and telecommunications industries. They include corporate partners Matthew Lyons, Carmelo Gordian, Alan Bickerstaff, Ted Gilman, Brian Dillavou and Russ Denton, litigation partner David Whittlesey and investment funds counsel J.R. Morgan. Lyons, who will head the Austin office, said a total of 18 lawyers will move from Andrews Kurth, including associates in the corporate and litigation practices.
Shearman & Sterling also plans to open a Houston office that will focus on energy transactions, including oil and gas projects. Texas Lawyer recently reported that a group of oil and gas lawyers is expected to move to Shearman's new Houston office from Baker Botts. That team, which will be led by Baker Botts oil and gas practice chair Hugh Tucker, cannot move now because Baker Botts has a 90-day leave policy.
In an interview Wednesday, firm leaders said the Austin office is expected to have about 25 to 30 attorneys. The Houston office, which will open in a few months, will have eight to 10 partners by the end of the year. Shearman leaders said the new office openings are part of the firms “long-term strategy.”
Shearman is also considering a larger plan for the Austin office. Incoming senior partner David Beveridge said the firm is exploring the possibility that it would become a site for talented nonpartner track associates and staff attorneys with “quality of life” considerations. Beveridge said the Austin location is attractive because of its proximity to good universities, its venture capital business and the availability of highly skilled talent who may not want to be on the partnership track.
“It's a good spot to explore,” said Beveridge, a partner based in New York.
These considerations for the Austin office are not part of the immediate plan, however. The office will for now focus on the firm's tech and life sciences practices. The firm already has a staff attorney location in Melville, New York.
Lyons said his group's clients will benefit from Shearman & Sterling's premier capital markets practice, M&A expertise, deep relationships with financial institutions and its network of offices on the West Coast and globally.
“We felt it was time for Austin and for our clients to be part of a global elite law firm with international access to capital markets and M&A activity,” Lyons said. “Shearman is looking to us to work with the West Coast office to continue to develop and enhance the representation of emerging and start-up companies and venture capital.”
Lyons declined to identify the group's clients. “We have a national group of clients centered mostly in Texas, mostly in Austin, but venture capital and private equity markets are a national market with the significant players being on the West Coast and the East Coast as well as in Texas,” he said.
He said Shearman & Sterling's decision to be the first New York-based firm with a full-service Austin office is a “significant milestone in the maturation of the Central Texas economy.”
Lyons said the Andrews Kurth/Hunton & Williams merger will be a “fantastic combination,” but his group ultimately decided that moving to Shearman & Sterling was the best thing for their clients.
Andrews Kurth has lost lawyers to several firms in recent weeks as it finalized negotiations for a merger with the Virginia-based firm Hunton & Williams. That merger will take effect April 2.
A spokeswoman for Andrews Kurth declined to comment on the departures.
Several of the lawyers in the group have practiced together for more than 20 years. Many of them joined Andrews Kurth's Austin office in 2003 after California technology firm Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison dissolved.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSeyfarth Launches Energy Transactions Practice in Houston With Polsinelli Team
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Carter Mario Achieves $225,000 Settlement in Motor Vehicle Case
- 2Legal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
- 3'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
- 4SEC Penalizes Wells Fargo, LPL Financial $900,000 Each for Inaccurate Trading Data
- 5NY Firm's Amicus Brief Asks for Corporate Transparency Act to Remain on Pause
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250