Bracewell's Financials Edged Higher in 2017
Bracewell added two new practice areas in 2017 as part of 11 lateral partner hires.
March 09, 2018 at 03:43 PM
3 minute read
Bracewell improved its financials across the board in 2017, with gross revenue, net income, revenue per lawyer and profits per partner all higher than in 2016.
Strong demand in many practice areas led to gross revenue of $278.7 million for the Houston-based firm in 2017, up 0.7 percent when compared with $276.8 million in 2016. Net income came in at $90.05 million, up 2.7 percent when compared with $87.6 million the prior year.
Revenue per lawyer was $756,000, an increase of 1.1 percent when compared with $748,000 in 2016. And profits per partner were $1.3 million, up 1.2 percent compared with $1.29 million the year before.
“It was a good year, an excellent year, across many practice areas and offices,” said managing partner Gregory Bopp.
The firm's technology practice, including intellectual property litigation and patent prosecution, also had an “excellent year,” as did the firm's litigation practice, he added.
The firm's transactional lawyers worked on a number of large deals in 2017. It represented Great Plains Energy in a merger with Westar Energy, for example. It also represented longtime client Kinder Morgan in a $4.15 billion pipeline deal, and Parsley Energy in its acquisition of Permian Basin assets from Double Eagle Energy in a $2.8 billion cash-and-stock deal.
In 2017, the firm had 369 lawyers on a full-time-equivalent basis—down a single lawyer from 370 the year before.
Bopp said the firm added 11 lateral partners in 2017. With those hires, the firm also added two new practices. In Washington, D.C., it added a governments contracts practice with partners Angela Styles, who came from Crowell & Moring, where she had been chair of the firm, and Robert Wagman, who left Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer. The firm also added an international disputes practice in London, with partners Damian Watkin, coming from McDermott Will & Emery, and John Gilbert, who departed K&L Gates.
“The two practice areas were both high-priority practice areas for us. We were just waiting for the right opportunity to bring on high-quality partners,” Bopp said.
Looking ahead, Bopp said 2018 is on a good track. “The work levels are very robust right now,” he said. “We are at full capacity.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSeyfarth Launches Energy Transactions Practice in Houston With Polsinelli Team
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250