Robert S. Bennett Deemed Ineligible for State Bar Board Race
With only one dissent, the State Bar of Texas executive committee voted March 8 to affirm its executive director's decision that Houston attorney Robert S. “Bob” Bennett is ineligible to run for a seat on the bar's board of directors.
March 09, 2018 at 12:37 PM
3 minute read
With only one dissent, the State Bar of Texas executive committee voted March 8 to affirm its executive director's decision that Houston attorney Robert S. “Bob” Bennett is ineligible to run for a seat on the bar's board of directors.
Bennett, owner of Bob Bennett & Associates, said the committee's vote came as no surprise. “I knew how it was going to turn out,” he said after the meeting.
The committee's vote is the latest setback for Bennett since he received a judgment of disbarment from a Harris County District Court in March 2014. Carmen Kelsey, then-judge of the 289th District Court in San Antonio, had signed the judgment.
Two years later, Bennett won a reversal of the disbarment after the Fourteenth Court of Appeals found that the district court erred when it concluded he had violated Rule 1.15(d) of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct. However, the appeals court affirmed the district court's finding that Bennett had violated Rule 3.02 of the disciplinary rules, which prohibits a lawyer from unreasonably increasing the costs or other burdens of a case or unreasonably delaying resolution of the matter.
The Fourteenth Court remanded Bennett's disciplinary suit to the district court for reconsideration of the “appropriate sanction” for the violation of Rule 3.02. Kelsey had lost her bid for re-election in 2014, and Bennett faced a new judge at the sanction hearing in May 2017.
Judge Craig Smith of the 192nd District Court in Dallas, who was appointed to the case, issued a new judgment giving Bennett a partially suspended probation of two years, six months and three days. Bennett is appealing that judgment as well.
But Smith gave Bennett credit for the two years and three days that he was not allowed to practice law while subject to the disbarment. The six-month probated suspension ended Dec. 31, 2017.
Bennett pointed out that he was eligible to run for a bar director's seat in 2017, although he lost that race.
“Nothing has happened since that time,” Bennett said.
State Bar President Tom Vick, who recused himself from the executive committee's March 8 vote, said Bennett's suspension was not in effect at the time of the 2017 race. But Bennett now has a suspension on his record.
“If you get suspended, you're ineligible,” said Vick, a partner in Vick Carney in Weatherford.
Under State Bar Rule IV, Section 5, an attorney who has been suspended for misconduct must have been reinstated for at least 10 years before the beginning of a director's term to be eligible to run for that seat.
But Bennett said, “I was never fully suspended.”
He also noted that his appeal of the judgment of partially probated suspension remains pending.
Austin solo Joe Longley, the State Bar's president-elect, cast the only vote against affirming Executive Director Trey Apffel's decision that Bennett is ineligible.
“I didn't see any reason to keep him off (the ballot),” Longley said. “I felt like he had made a case that it was equitably in his favor.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEversheds Sutherland Adds Hunton Andrews Energy Lawyer With Cross-Border Experience
3 minute readEx-Marathon General Counsel Takes Legal Reins of Another Energy Company
After Nearly 2 Decades in the Role, Longtime Haynes and Boone General Counsel Passes the Baton
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250