Susman Team Wins $706.2M Trade Secret Verdict for Real Estate Valuation Client
Backed by Susman Godfrey, automated appraisal company HouseCanary wins a Texas tussle with Quicken Loans affiliate.
March 15, 2018 at 06:57 PM
3 minute read
They're singing “We're in the Money” at HouseCanary Inc.
The provider of real estate valuation and assessment tools won a $706.2 million verdict Wednesday in a trade secret and breach-of-contract action in Texas state court.
A Susman Godfrey team led by partners Max Tribble and Kalpana Srinivasan persuaded a San Antonio jury that a Quicken Loans affiliate used a license as subterfuge to reverse-engineer its own competing valuation model. The verdict includes $403.2 million in punitive damages.
“I don't think the irony should be lost on anyone: They sued us first,” Tribble said Thursday. “There probably never would have been a lawsuit but that they sued us first.”
HouseCanary was formed after the 2007-09 housing crisis to automate a system of precise residential real estate appraisals. Consumers may be more familiar with the Zillow estimate of home prices, but Tribble says HouseCanary's model is far more accurate and has drawn investors such as former Google chairman Eric Schmidt.
It also drew the interest of Quicken and its appraisal affiliate, Title Source Inc., now known as Amrock. In 2013, Title Source licensed HouseCanary's appraiser software for $5 million a year plus access to Title Source's appraisal data. Both sides signed Title Source's standard nondisclosure agreement, which forbade either party from reverse-engineering the other's models, algorithms or confidential information.
“They kept asking us to disclose more and more of the detail—What are the inputs? How does your model work?” Tribble said. His client was assured that Title Source “was not developing its own valuation models, and that turned out to be totally false. That was their intention. That was what they did.”
At first, Title Source sued HouseCanary for fraud. That prompted HouseCanary to counterclaim for fraud, breach of contract and for theft of its trade secrets. Title Source was represented by Greenberg Traurig.
The jury found against Title Source on all of its claims. Instead, it found Title Source committed fraud against HouseCanary, breached the license agreement and misappropriated HouseCanary's trade secrets.
Tribble said jurors recognized the value of HouseCanary's model to Quicken, the country's second-largest online loan broker. When receiving a refinance inquiry, Quicken and Title Source can use the HouseCanary model to get an immediate and highly accurate valuation. They can decide on the spot whether the lead is worth pursuing, rather than wait several weeks for a human appraiser.
Title Source witnesses insisted they weren't trying to reverse-engineer the HouseCanary model, “but the evidence at trial showed that's exactly what they were doing,” Tribble said.
“It was really the most amazing trial I've ever had,” he said. “And I've had quite a few.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNo Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Field Client Questions as Trump Issues Executive Orders on Industry Funding, Oversight
6 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250