Attorney Who Allegedly Revealed Confidential Information About Ex-Client Faces Disciplinary Case
An attorney who sued a client for to collect attorney fees she owed in an underlying divorce case is now in trouble with the State Bar of Texas for allegedly revealing confidential information about the client in the fee lawsuit.
March 22, 2018 at 03:36 PM
4 minute read
An attorney who sued a client for to collect attorney fees she owed in an underlying divorce case is now in trouble with the State Bar of Texas for allegedly revealing confidential information about the client in the fee lawsuit.
The attorney, Dallas solo practitioner Eric Gormly, is also facing a separate disciplinary matter that arose last summer.
The most recent disciplinary case, filed in Dallas County district court on March 15, involve's Gormly's representation of a woman in 2012 in connection with a divorce matter between a different woman and her husband. Gormly's client paid him $6,000 for representing her, said the petition in Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. Gormly.
About five years later, in June 2017, Gormly filed a lawsuit against the client, seeking to recover his attorney fees from her. But in his petition and a later amended petition, Gormly disclosed personal, confidential information about the client and how she was connected to the other woman in the underlying divorce case, alleged the petition. Gormly had gathered the confidential information when he was representing his client in the underlying case. He also revealed personal, confidential information through earlier emails in September 2016, the petition claimed.
Gormly's client filed a complaint against him with the State Bar of Texas. When the bar's Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel sent the complaint to Gormly, he failed to respond to the complaint, as required in the attorney disciplinary rules, said the petition.
The Commission for Lawyer Discipline alleged in the petition that Gormly's conduct violates rules in the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct that bar an attorney from revealing a client's confidential information to anyone except the client, client's representatives, or the lawyer's own law firm colleagues; using a client's confidential information to hurt the ex-client; and using a client's privileged information to benefit the lawyer.
Gormly was served with citation of the lawsuit March 21, and he hasn't yet filed an answer in the case.
In another pending disciplinary lawsuit, filed in Dallas County district court in June 2017, the Commission for Lawyer Discipline alleged that a woman hired Gormly in a divorce and child custody case. She paid $4,500 to Gormly. At the end, the client asked Gormly for her file and belongings, but he failed to return her papers or property. The commission alleged that his conduct violated a disciplinary rule that requires an attorney to return a client's papers and property at the termination of representation.
Gormly, who is defending himself pro se, has denied all of the allegations in an answer on July 17, 2017.
He has a past public disciplinary history that lead to his suspension from practicing law for one month from mid-July 2014 to mid-August 2014, and then probation for the next 17 months, ending in January 2016. The agreed judgment in that matter said that Gormly agreed to findings of fact that said he had taken a position that unreasonably increased the costs in a case or unreasonably delayed the resolution of the matter. He also knowingly made false statements of fact or law to a tribunal, and made frivolous claims.
Gormly's State Bar profile said he earned his law degree from Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law in 2009 and became licensed to practice law in Texas in 2010. His profile on his law firm website said that he was a television news reporter for 10 years and then earned a Ph.D. and taught journalism and broadcast production at universities. He then returned to school again and earned his law degree. In his law firm, Gormly practices litigation, family law, estate and probate, LGBT Law, media and entertainment and intellectual property.
Gormly didn't immediately return a call seeking comment.
Claire Mock, spokeswoman of the bar's Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel, which represents the commission in the lawsuits, declined to comment.
Angela Morris is a freelance journalist. Follow her on Twitter at @AMorrisReports
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBracewell Adds Former Pioneer Natural Resources Lawyer to O&G, Energy Transition Practices
2 minute readSpecial Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Dispute Resolution Boards—Getting Real Time Decisions on Construction Projects
- 2Commonwealth Court Overturns Award of Damages Assessed Against Landlord on Claims of Unlawful Discrimination
- 3NY Top Court to Decide Whether County Governments Owe Special Duty to Foster Care Placements
- 4Tesla, Musk Appeal Chancery Compensation Case to Delaware Supreme Court
- 5Some New Twists and Old Tricks for an Ethical New Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250