Big Law Associate's Life Ensnared in Austin Bomber's Fate
In the midst of a trial, Pillsbury Winthrop's Liz Marcum got a terrifying call about her husband's involvement in the car chase to apprehend the suspect.
March 23, 2018 at 12:07 PM
5 minute read
As a bomber terrorized Austin this month, Big Law senior associate Liz Marcum had a very specific reason to be worried.
While law enforcement moved in on the suspect, Liz Marcum's husband—Deputy U.S. Marshal Robert Marcum—was called in to track and apprehend the bomber.
To make matters worse, Liz Marcum, a senior associate in the Austin office of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, was working in San Antonio representing Academy of Allergy & Asthma in a three-week antitrust trial, a case she had been working on for four years.
In the early morning hours on Wednesday, Liz Marcum got a call from an unknown number. She feared the worst—was it the one call that the spouse of a law enforcement officer never wants to receive? Thankfully, Marcum said it was her husband, “Bobby,” with quite a story about how he rammed the back of the vehicle driven by perpetrator Mark Anthony Conditt during a car chase. Her husband witnessed the bomber commit suicide by detonating an explosive device inside his car.
We spoke with Liz Marcum, who practices antitrust and competition law, about her husband's story and what it's been like for her to be stuck in trial during the Austin bombing terror. Here are her answers, edited for brevity and clarity.
What does your husband do in his job on a normal, day-to-day basis?
He is on the warrant side on what's called the Lone Star Fugitive Task Force. It's composed of local, state and federal agencies. He works every day with the Travis County Sheriff's Office and Austin Police. He hunts fugitives for a living. Whether it's someone who has an active warrant that's new—he'll go find them. He'll work on cases where someone left the country or area before sentencing or court. He hunts bad guys—I'm very proud of him.
What was his role in the investigation into the Austin bombing perpetrator?
He was involved from the beginning on an informational basis, where he was in contact with the APD; they would have various meetings to share information. It was an incredible effort on everyone's part. Recently, when they figured out who it was, Bobby got involved—the Lone Star Fugitive Task Force—they got involved.
I understand your husband was involved in the car chase that ended with the suspect exploding his vehicle. What's the story of your husband's role?
My husband was in his truck, a government vehicle. He started driving; so did the SWAT vehicles. They boxed him in. I think my husband hit his car and pretty soon after that, he ignited the bomb in his own car. It happened very close to my husband.
What was your reaction to hearing all of this?
It terrifies me now, knowing how close he was, but it's a testament to: he gives everything, every day, for his job, even when his life is at risk. He has been shot at. Everything happens to the guys on this task force.
Is your husband OK? Was he hurt at all?
He was still in his truck. There was one person who got hurt; I don't know how. But my husband, luckily, he was in the car—but he saw it go off. I said, 'Are your ears OK and everything?' He said, 'I am fine.' He did have to be photographed to make sure nothing on his body got hurt, and he was fine. I thank God. He was so close.
You mentioned your trial in San Antonio. What was going on in your trial at this time?
When [the car chase] happened, I was up preparing for arguments. I got a call from a number I didn't know. I was afraid it was the call that no companion of a law enforcement officer wants to get. It's always that call I worry about answering: I don't know who it is, and they say something about my husband. But it was my husband—he said, 'I'm OK. My phone is in my truck—it's a crime scene.
I can't imagine what it's been like for you. Can you tell me about the whole ordeal from your perspective?
Ever since we've been together, I've been nervous because, obviously, he's in harm's way every day. Every day he comes home, he has some crazy stories. I'm so proud of him, but of course, I worry. This is not the first time he had a sensitive, imminent and dangerous situation, but he goes out there—he still puts everything out there.
Angela Morris is a freelance journalist. Follow her on Twitter at @AMorrisReports
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Litigators of the Week: A Trade Secret Win at the ITC for Viking Over Promising Potential Liver Drug
- 2Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 3'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Match Group's Katie Dugan & Herrick's Carol Goodman
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Eric Wall, Executive VP, Syllo
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250