Felony Road Rage Case Against Texas Judge Ends in Acquittal on One Count, Mistrial on Second
A Texas jury found Corpus Christi state district judge Guy Williams not guilty on one felony count but could not resolve a second charge, forcing…
March 26, 2018 at 03:08 PM
3 minute read
A Texas jury found Corpus Christi state district judge Guy Williams not guilty on one felony count but could not resolve a second charge, forcing a mistrial against the jurist who was accused of pointing his gun at two motorists during an alleged road rage incident.
Williams, who presides over the 148th District Court in Nueces County, was indicted on two aggravated assault charges last year after he was accused of attempting to run another vehicle off the road and pointing a gun at its occupants. The State Commission on Judicial Conduct later suspended Williams from the bench without pay because of the charges.
After a weeklong trial, A Nueces County jury indicated to Judge Sid Harle, a San Antonio judge hearing the case by assignment, that they had found Williams not guilty on one charge. But the jury was unable to resolve the second charge against Williams, forcing Harle to declare a mistrial on that count.
During the trial, Jane Starnes, a prosecutor for the Texas Attorney General's Office, argued that the case boiled down to the word of the victims against that of Williams according to a report in the Corpus Christi Caller-Times. Starnes had argued that Williams pointed his gun at the victims after he cut them off in traffic.
“What have they got to gain from going through this,” Starnes asked the jury. “Do you think this was enjoyable for them, to put themselves through this, to talk to the police several times about the worst night of their lives? Do you think it was fun when they got up there and got cross examined? What's in it for them? They've got no motive to come in here and lie to y'all.”
But Williams' attorney Lisa Greenberg said she argued that the judge acted in self-defense and only “brandished” his gun at both the driver and his wife during the dispute but did not point it at them.
“We say he showed his weapon and the guy got back in his car. And then they followed him,'' said Lisa Greenberg, who represents Williams. “He's a Purple Heart veteran and Vietnam Vet. And he doesn't play.''
Greenberg explained that the jury found Williams not guilty of aggravated assault against the driver of the car, but could not decide on whether he had committed the same offense against the passenger.
“He can't be retried on the first charged, but we don't know if he can be retried on the second,'' Greenberg said.
Starnes declined to answer whether she planned to retry Williams, referring comment to the Texas Attorney General's press office. Kayleigh Lovvorn, a spokeswoman for the AG's Office, declined to comment about the case.
Greenberg said she hopes Williams won't face another trial.
“I think it would be stupid and a waste of judicial resources because the jury has already said it was an act of self-defense,'' Greenberg said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaxton Calls for Resignation of Gray Reed Lawyer, Politician for Improperly Influencing Judge
5 minute readWhat Kirkland's 'Project Second Chance,' Led by a Former Federal Prosecutor, Has Accomplished So Far
3 minute readFraud Trial for Fintech Entrepreneur Is Pushed to 2025
Former FTX Executive Caroline Ellison Sentenced to Two Years in Prison, $11 Billion Forfeiture for Fraud
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250