Appellate Lawyer of the Week: Houston Lawyer Wins Mosquito Bite Ruling at Fifth Circuit
Can something as small as a mosquito bite trigger accidental death coverage? That's a question headed to a federal jury after Houston lawyer Jim Plummer won an appellate ruling reviving his client's breach of contract claim against an insurance company.
March 30, 2018 at 01:46 PM
4 minute read
Jim Plummer.
Can something as small as a mosquito bite trigger accidental death coverage under an insurance policy?
That's a question that will soon be headed to a federal jury after Houston lawyer Jim Plummer won a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reviving his client's breach of contract claim against an insurance company.
Plummer represents Gloria Wells, whose husband, Melton Dean Wells, was bitten by a mosquito carrying West Nile Virus (WNV) in 2013. Melton Wells—who was 68 years old and had a history of obesity, diabetes and hypertension—went to a hospital where he was diagnosed with WNV and later died.
Wells' death certificate listed WNV as his cause of death and acute respiratory failure, septic shock and multi-system failure as the conditions leading to the death. And the certifying physician listed Wells' cause of death as “natural” as opposed to “accident” on the death certificate.
Gloria Wells submitted a claim to Minnesota Life Insurance Co. for payment of accidental-death benefits under her husband's life insurance policy. But the company denied the claim, contending that there was no information to support that Melton Wells' death was an accident, and that it appeared his death was exacerbated by diabetes, morbid obesity and old age.
Gloria Wells later filed a lawsuit against the insurance company in U.S. district court in Houston alleging breach of contract and a tort claim for bad-faith investigation. But the trial court dismissed her claim for several reasons, including that Gloria Wells failed to introduce evidence that a mosquito bite should be considered “accidental” under the life insurance police. She appealed that decision to the Fifth Circuit.
The Fifth Circuit recently concluded that Wells had met her burden of showing that there is a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether her husband's death from WNV triggered accidental death coverage under the insurance policy.
“As for the bite itself, the policy explains that an accidental bodily injury is unintended, unexpected, and unforeseen; and there is evidence that Melton did not intend, expect or foresee that he would be bitten by a WNV-infected Culex mosquito,” wrote Judge E. Grady Jolly in a decision reinstating Gloria Wells' breach of contract claim against Minnesota Life.
However, the Fifth Circuit upheld dismissal of the bad-faith claim against the insurance company after concluding the company had a reasonable basis for denying the insurance coverage claim based on Melton Wells' medical record.
Plummer, a partner in Houston's Berg Plummer Johnson & Raval, said the ruling will allow Gloria Wells to present her contract claim to a federal jury.
“We argued that some of the terms of the insurance clause were somewhat ambiguous. And the Fifth Circuit agreed that the reasonable construction of those ambiguous clauses should prevail which permits us to go to the jury on those factual issues,” Plummer said.
Amanda Sotak, a partner in Dallas' Figari + Davenport who represents Minnesota Life Insurance, declined to comment on the ruling.
Plummer noted that Melton Wells had purchased the life insurance policy for his wife after reading literature from Minnesota Life Insurance promising that the policy would pay off the mortgage on the Wellses' Conroe home in the event of his death.
“The marketing material of this company said we sell a promise,” Plummer said. “And we're going to hold them to that promise—if the jury agrees with us.''
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHomegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
6 minute readHouston Appeals Court Split Over Race Discrimination Suit Involving COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250