New Nonprofit Firm the First Founded by Baby Lawyers
Two recent law graduates in Houston have joined a national trend by launching a new nonprofit law firm to serve low- and middle-income clients.
April 02, 2018 at 05:00 AM
8 minute read
Two recent law graduates in Houston have joined a national trend by launching a new nonprofit law firm to serve low- and middle-income clients.
Access Justice Houston, founded by 2017 University of Houston Law Center graduates MacKenzie Dunham and Doug Evans, has become the fourth Texas-based nonprofit firm—along with DiFilippo Holistic Law Center in Austin, Legal Access Texas in Dallas, and Greater Waco Legal Services in Waco—that are targeting modest-means clients in an effort to close the justice gap. The other Texas-based nonprofit firms were launched by veteran lawyers; Dunham and Evans are the first recent law graduates to take the plunge.
Observers of the nonprofit firm trend note that there are pros and cons to launching a nonprofit law firm, and that there are alternative career paths for new grads that still help to close the justice gap. In the for-profit world, recent grads, shepherded by legal incubators, have been launching solo practices targeting the modest-means demographic. It's also possible that in the future, the growing number of nonprofit firms will begin offering new public-interest job opportunities, which are currently scarce and competitive.
Alison Grinter, executive director and attorney at Legal Access Texas, said she feels encouraged to see young lawyers so interested in the nonprofit firm world.
“The kind of energy and love for the work that recent law graduates bring is going to really power an industry like this,” she said.
Eventually, Dunham and Evans hope to begin hiring other recent law grads for entry-level positions at Access Justice Houston.
“We're trying to meet the need of both modest-means clients and also people coming out of law school who want to do public service. Public service jobs at least in Harris County are very scarce,” Dunham said. “If you want to do public-interest work, it's a very viable way of getting your foot in the door.”
The nonprofit firm trend stems from Open Legal Service, a nonprofit firm in Salt Lake City. The trendsetter nonprofit keeps a directory of 34 nonprofit law firms nationwide.
Nonprofit firm founders share a motivation and passion for helping people gain access to justice. Some founders are recent law grads who wanted to handle public-interest work, but couldn't find jobs with existing nonprofits. Other founders are veteran attorneys from legal aid organizations or big law who are looking for a new future.
Dunham and Evans launched Access Justice Houston with a $3,000 grant from the University of Houston Law Center's solo incubator. Access Justice Houston serves clients who fall between 125 percent and 400 percent of the federal poverty guideline, charging sliding-scale hourly fees ranging from $75 to $160. The nonprofit assists clients with family law, immigration and criminal-defense matters, and consumer protection matters such as evictions or debt collection defense.
To keep rates low, it has focused on using free resources and implementing technology solutions to cut overhead costs. For example, Dunham and Evans are working in a free downtown office donated by a board member, and use the free service Google Voice for their telephones. Their alma mater offers a year of free legal research and practice management tools, and they've found free continuing legal education programs through the State Bar of Texas and Gideon's Promise, which trains defense lawyers for indigent clients.
The goal is to be self-sustaining based on the fees the clients are paying. But once the Internal Revenue Service finishes processing its application for 501(c)3 status, Access Justice Houston will be able to apply for grants as well.
The nonprofit's board of directors set the annual salaries for Dunham and Evans at about $50,000, which is commensurate with the salary of an entry-level legal aid lawyer. The nonprofit isn't yet making enough revenue to pay Dunham and Evans their full salaries, but they hope that will change when they have more cases and bill more hours.
“Within six months, we should be—if not at our full salaries—then fairly close,” said Evans.
To make ends meet in the meantime, both of them entered the income-based repayments program, which set their monthly student loan payments to zero for this year. The amount will change next year after they recertify their income.
“Hopefully in about 10 years, the loans will be forgiven through public loan forgiveness,” Evans said.
Qualifying for public loan forgiveness is the biggest benefit for new grads who launch nonprofit firms, noted Luz Herrera, professor and associate dean for experiential education at Texas A&M University School of Law in Fort Worth.
Nonprofits also qualify for donations or grants, unlike for-profit practices. Courts and other legal aid providers are allowed to refer clients to a nonprofit firm, which they can't do for traditional practices, said Herrera, who organized last year's Incubator Consortium, a conference for incubators and nonprofit firms. However, on the negative side, the lawyers who work at a nonprofit firm won't have the same level of control over the direction of the business. The nonprofit's board makes those decisions.
It could also be a headache for a baby lawyer to learn to practice law, and simultaneously learn to run a nonprofit.
Grinter, who co-founded Dallas' Legal Access Texas after practicing criminal defense for 12 years, noted that a new nonprofit firm will face all of the difficulties of opening a solo for-profit practice. But there are extra challenges to understand the intricacies of the nonprofit world.
“I know enough about the practice of law that I was able to add on the strain of managing a nonprofit,” Grinter said. “I can't even fathom trying to learn both at once.”
A for-profit, low bono practice is an alternative for recent grads who want to help modest-means clients.
Herrera said that more than 60 legal incubators, launched in the past 10 years, have driven law students and recent grads to take an interest in low bono models. Whether a nonprofit or for-profit firm, she noted, a new lawyer must have a solid plan to make the venture sustainable.
“They are not always going to be successful,” she said. “Whether it's nonprofit or for-profit, you have to remember: these are businesses, so all the same rules apply.”
A low bono practice will not generate as much revenue or provide as high a salary, compared with a traditional solo practice.
“You're not going to live in the penthouse and drive the fanciest car,” said Herrera, who ran a low bono practice for six years before she became a law professor. “They have to live modestly. This idea you're going to be a high-roller lawyer in the first few years—it's hard to do as a low bono lawyer, but people can make a living.”
Living on a tight budget is nothing new to low bono solo Mario Cantu. After graduating from St. Mary's University School of Law in 2015, he earned the salary of a staff attorney at San Antonio-based nonprofit RAICES, which provides free and low-cost legal services to immigrants.
Cantu always had an entrepreneurial spirit and knew he'd wind up opening his own practice. When he left RAICES, Cantu said he thought about creating a nonprofit firm, but opted for a for-profit practice.
“Opening a nonprofit was daunting. I know from working at the nonprofit RAICES, they were depending on grants and private donations. I didn't see it as workable in the situation I was in financially,” explained Cantu, a participant in the State Bar of Texas legal incubator, the Texas Opportunity and Justice Incubator.
Modest-means clients are still the target of Cantu's immigration practice. He serves people whose income falls between 125 percent to 400 percent of the federal poverty guideline. He charges flat rates: A green card petition would be $500, citizenship and naturalization ranges from $500 to $600, and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals forms for a “dreamer” cost $200.
Whether going the nonprofit route or opening a traditional practice, low bono lawyers are driven by a passion to help people.
Access Justice Houston co-founder Evans noted that money has never been the biggest draw for public-interest attorneys.
“If I'm not making the megabucks, then what can I do that actually makes me feel happy and also make a living? Maybe not the greatest living, but it still makes ends meet,” he said.
Angela Morris is a freelance journalist. Follow her on Twitter at @AMorrisReports.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250