Dallas Attorney Gets Eight Years in Prison for Masturbating in Front of Teens at Law Office
A Dallas criminal defense attorney who lured teenage girls to his law office with the promise of a job and then masturbated in front of them will be…
April 06, 2018 at 02:09 PM
3 minute read
A Dallas criminal defense attorney who lured teenage girls to his law office with the promise of a job and then masturbated in front of them will be spending the next eight years of his life in prison after he was convicted of two counts of felony indecency with a child by exposure.
Rayan Ganesh, 34, was sentenced yesterday by 282nd State District Judge Amber Givens-Davis.
Ganesh was also charged with seven felony counts of barratry. Prosecutors alleged that Ganesh would roam the hallways of Dallas' Frank Crowley Courts Building looking for defendants who were not represented by counsel.
“He would come down here every day and approach people who didn't have lawyers and would tell them he could get their case dismissed for a very low price, usually for about $500,” Mike Snipes, Dallas County's first assistant district attorney, said in an interview. “If they happened to have a teenage daughter with them, and if they were Hispanic, he would offer them a job.”
Snipes alleged Ganesh would have the teenage girls, who ranged in age from 15 to 19 years old, come to his law office after business hours to “work.”
“He would look at teen Hispanic porn on his computer,” Snipe said. “And the girls testified they saw the porn and he would stare at them and masturbate.”
Ganesh was only tried on two indecency charges, but Snipes alleged he had more victims.
Bill Cox, a Dallas County criminal defense attorney who represents Ganesh, did not immediately return a call for comment.
While prosecutors declined to try Ganesh on the barratry charges, one Dallas criminal defense attorney testified during the punishment phase of the trial that he witnessed Ganesh roaming the hallways of the courthouse ”stalking” clients and was offended by his behavior.
Lee Bright, a Dallas criminal defense attorney, testified that he had a verbal confrontation with Ganesh after watching him approach a long-term client of his in the courthouse.
“I know other attorneys who sat down with him and said 'You can't do this. Here are the elements of the offense of barratry and you have to stop doing this,'” Bright said in an interview. “And it would go in one ear and out the other. We would literally sit in the foyer and watch it happen.''
At the conclusion of his trial, the courtroom was packed with about 30 lawyers—both prosecutors and criminal defense attorneys—who were there to see justice served to Ganesh, Snipes said.
“I had all of the lawyers in the courtroom stand up. And I said 'Each of you are victims of this,'” Snipes said, referring to Ganesh's unethical behavior. “Because you make us look like the worst nightmare of the public as to what lawyers are all about.'”
“He preyed upon defendants when they were at their weakest moment and took advantage. And then he used them to take advantage of these little girls,” Snipes said. “The barratry part is problematic. But him using that to feed his salacious desires is really what made it bad.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSCOTUSblog Co-Founder Tom Goldstein Misused Law Firm Funds, According to Federal Indictment
2 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250