Dallas Attorney Gets Eight Years in Prison for Masturbating in Front of Teens at Law Office
A Dallas criminal defense attorney who lured teenage girls to his law office with the promise of a job and then masturbated in front of them will be…
April 06, 2018 at 02:09 PM
3 minute read
A Dallas criminal defense attorney who lured teenage girls to his law office with the promise of a job and then masturbated in front of them will be spending the next eight years of his life in prison after he was convicted of two counts of felony indecency with a child by exposure.
Rayan Ganesh, 34, was sentenced yesterday by 282nd State District Judge Amber Givens-Davis.
Ganesh was also charged with seven felony counts of barratry. Prosecutors alleged that Ganesh would roam the hallways of Dallas' Frank Crowley Courts Building looking for defendants who were not represented by counsel.
“He would come down here every day and approach people who didn't have lawyers and would tell them he could get their case dismissed for a very low price, usually for about $500,” Mike Snipes, Dallas County's first assistant district attorney, said in an interview. “If they happened to have a teenage daughter with them, and if they were Hispanic, he would offer them a job.”
Snipes alleged Ganesh would have the teenage girls, who ranged in age from 15 to 19 years old, come to his law office after business hours to “work.”
“He would look at teen Hispanic porn on his computer,” Snipe said. “And the girls testified they saw the porn and he would stare at them and masturbate.”
Ganesh was only tried on two indecency charges, but Snipes alleged he had more victims.
Bill Cox, a Dallas County criminal defense attorney who represents Ganesh, did not immediately return a call for comment.
While prosecutors declined to try Ganesh on the barratry charges, one Dallas criminal defense attorney testified during the punishment phase of the trial that he witnessed Ganesh roaming the hallways of the courthouse ”stalking” clients and was offended by his behavior.
Lee Bright, a Dallas criminal defense attorney, testified that he had a verbal confrontation with Ganesh after watching him approach a long-term client of his in the courthouse.
“I know other attorneys who sat down with him and said 'You can't do this. Here are the elements of the offense of barratry and you have to stop doing this,'” Bright said in an interview. “And it would go in one ear and out the other. We would literally sit in the foyer and watch it happen.''
At the conclusion of his trial, the courtroom was packed with about 30 lawyers—both prosecutors and criminal defense attorneys—who were there to see justice served to Ganesh, Snipes said.
“I had all of the lawyers in the courtroom stand up. And I said 'Each of you are victims of this,'” Snipes said, referring to Ganesh's unethical behavior. “Because you make us look like the worst nightmare of the public as to what lawyers are all about.'”
“He preyed upon defendants when they were at their weakest moment and took advantage. And then he used them to take advantage of these little girls,” Snipes said. “The barratry part is problematic. But him using that to feed his salacious desires is really what made it bad.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaxton Calls for Resignation of Gray Reed Lawyer, Politician for Improperly Influencing Judge
5 minute readWhat Kirkland's 'Project Second Chance,' Led by a Former Federal Prosecutor, Has Accomplished So Far
3 minute readFraud Trial for Fintech Entrepreneur Is Pushed to 2025
Former FTX Executive Caroline Ellison Sentenced to Two Years in Prison, $11 Billion Forfeiture for Fraud
Trending Stories
- 1Corporate Counsel's 2024 Award Winners Performed Legal Wizardry, Gave a Hand Up to Others
- 2Goodwin, Polsinelli, Fox Rothschild Find New Phila. Offices
- 3Helping Lawyers Move Away from ‘Grinding’ and Toward a ‘Flow’
- 4How GC-of-Year Sam Khichi Has Helped CVS Barrel Through Challenges
- 5A Website is Not a ‘Place.’ What Took So Long To Get This Right?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250