'Starry-Eyed' Firms Looking for Lone-Star Mates as Merger Mania Strikes Texas
Two big mergers involving Texas firms became final this month. Could more be on the way?
April 06, 2018 at 01:10 PM
4 minute read
It looks like merger mania struck Texas this month, with two big law firm mergers involving Texas firms taking effect and another deal reportedly in the works. But law firm consultants say it won't end there.
“That train is not stopping anytime soon,” said David Barnard, a founding partner of the legal consulting firm Blaqwell Inc.
As of April 1, the landscape of the Texas legal market was markedly and permanently altered. That day, Dallas-based Gardere Wynne Sewell merged with Foley & Lardner, creating a 1,100-lawyer firm known in Texas as Foley Gardere. On April 2, Andrews Kurth Kenyon, a firm founded in Houston more than 100 years ago, merged with the Virginia-based firm Hunton & Williams, creating the 1,000-lawyer Hunton Andrews Kurth. Strasburger & Price, another large Dallas firm, is in merger talks with the Detroit firm Clark Hill, and that deal could close soon.
The recent mergers demonstrate the attractiveness of the Texas market. But the deals have also put pressure on other Texas firms that now must consider that they too may need to merge, simply because further market consolidation is inevitable.
They have added to the disruption that the Texas legal industry has already been experiencing for some time, prompted by a number of large, prominent firms opening offices in the state, creating new competition with the Texas homegrown firms and stirring up the lateral market.
Texas has been “a wonderful market for untapped value,” said Chris Batz, a legal recruiter in Kansas City who is founder of the Lion Group.
Barnard said Texas firms are willing to combine with out-of-state firms because those links provide them the financial ability to become competitive in New York and Washington, D.C.—the two fastest growing markets. Also, mergers give the Texas firms greater resources, including a greater diversity of high-value practices and more money to spend on technology, he said.
For the non-Texas-based firms, the mergers offer strong Texas practices such as energy, healthcare and intellectual property.
“All of it is very strategic. All of it is very carefully considered,” Barnard said. “Very few of these acquisitions are made [simply] because it seems like a good idea. Most of them are made for particularly focused business reasons,” he said.
Much like accounting firms a few decades ago, law firms are now in a period of consolidation. In many situations, the general consensus is that bigger is better because a deep bench in a wide variety of practice areas and a wide net of offices around the world meets the needs of clients, consultants say.
But many firms have their eyes on Texas firms in particular because of the strength of its economy, the number of corporate headquarters in Texas, and the growing number of lawyers in the state. According to the State Bar of Texas, 90,485 lawyers were actively practicing in Texas in 2017, up from 73,308 in 2007.
Marcie Shunk, a law firm consultant at The Tilt Institute in Houston, said Texas has been an active merger market for several years, but the merger mania slowed after Houston's Fulbright & Jaworski combined with the U.K. firm Norton Rose in 2013.
“I don't think there was a correlation per se, but that's when things started to shift,” she said. Indeed, it was after Texas firms turned gun-shy about mergers that some out-of-state firms started moving into Texas and opening offices there.
The influx of those branch offices—from such Big Law powerhouses as Latham & Watkins and Kirkland & Ellis—prompted some Texas firms to rethink the possibilities of a merger. “As some of the incumbent Texas firms looked around…[they recognized that] the market was going to become increasingly high-end and noisy with the addition of the other competitors,” she said.
Batz noted that in law firm economics, scale matters. So some large Texas firms that so far have avoided a merger may now consider going that route.
Shunk, Barnard and Batz each said they expect to see more mergers involving Texas firms in the future. Batz said he is approached at least once a month by an Am Law 200 firm in the Midwest that is interested in a deal in Texas.
“The Texas market is the New York of the South,” he said. “It dwarfs numerous markets around the country. It just continues to be a market that makes firms starry-eyed.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOnce the LA Fires Are Extinguished, Expect the Litigation to Unfold for Years
5 minute readSeyfarth Launches Energy Transactions Practice in Houston With Polsinelli Team
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1NYSBA Annual Meeting: How In-house Counsel Navigate Gen AI Risk
- 2A Judge Ordered Squabbling Lawyers to Have Lunch: Here's What Happened
- 3'Nerve-Wracking': Fires Disrupting but Not Halting Work of Distributed Firms' LA Lawyers
- 43rd Circ Orders SEC to Explain ‘How and When the Federal Securities Laws Apply to Digital Assets’
- 5PFAS in Drinking Water: Fabrics Manufacturer Among the Latest Hit With Toxic Tort Suit
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250