Burn Victim in Plywood Mill Explosion Secures $33M Verdict From Harris County Jury
A man severely burned in a fatal explosion at a plywood mill in Corrigan, Texas, has won a more than $33 million verdict.A Harris County jury…
April 16, 2018 at 12:03 PM
4 minute read
A man severely burned in a fatal explosion at a plywood mill in Corrigan, Texas, has won a more than $33 million verdict.
A Harris County jury on Wednesday awarded plaintiff Ralph Figgs $33.1 million for severe burns he sustained when an explosion rocked the Georgia-Pacific facility in April 2014. The verdict was rendered after more than three weeks of trial before Judge Michael Gomez and about eight hours of deliberation.
According to Arnold & Itkin attorney Kyle Findley, the case centered around arguments that the companies that designed and manufactured the facility's dust collection and spark detection systems failed to live up to industry standards.
“I think they saw that the industry standards for safety were ignored,” Findley said. “The plant was relying on them.”
According to the complaint, Aircon Corp. designed and manufactured the facility's dust collector system, and Grecon designed and manufactured the spark detection and suppression system.
The jury apportioned 51 percent liability against Aircon, 26 percent against Grecon and 23 percent against Georgia-Pacific, which had settled out of the case before trial under a confidential agreement.
According to the complaint, Figgs, a Georgia-Pacific employee, was working near a smoldering blower when an explosion occurred at the facility. The fire, the complaint said, moved quickly through the facility's dust collection system to the room where Figgs was working, known as the sander baghouse.
The sander baghouse, the complaint said, collected large amounts of dust from the facility's wood sanding operations, and the dust is highly flammable. Although the entire facility was supposed to have functional fire detection systems, the system at the facility failed, the complaint said.
Two of Figg's co-workers died as a result of the fire and five others, including Figgs, were injured, according to local media reports.
Following the explosion, Figgs was flown to a hospital in Houston, the complaint said. According to Findley, Figs suffered second- and third-degree burns on his arms and head, and he eventually underwent six surgeries, which included multiple debridements and skin grafts.
Figgs also suffered a traumatic brain injury during the incident, which caused some neuro-cognitive problems, and suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder, Findley said.
The defendants vigorously disputed liability, contending Georgia-Pacific was at fault for the explosion.
Jennifer Aufricht, a Dallas-based partner in Thompson Coe, who represented Grecon, noted that the system had been installed in 2004, and, according to testimony from the plant's employees, the system had worked flawlessly for those ten years. She also said that Grecon's spark detection and suppression system was not meant to extinguish large fires.
“My client's system worked exactly how it was intended to work that day, and for the 10 years preceding,” she said.
Faulting Georgia-Pacific, Aufricht said the facility failed to properly clean the ducts, which, she said, had plugging and suction problems in the weeks before the explosion. She also said the company failed to abide by clearly established safety zones, and instead either permitted or directed Figgs and others to work in the unsafe area.
She also noted that in November, a federal jury found Grecon was not at fault for the incident in a separate lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas by other victims of the explosion.
Grecon, she said, is planning to appeal the state court verdict.
Joseph Heard of Houston-based Heard & Medack, who represented Aircon, did not return a call for comment. The press office of Atlanta-based Georgia-Pacific did not return a call seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJury Awards $2M Damages, Attorney Fees, Enforcing Oral Partnership Agreement
4 minute readHolland & Knight Launches Mexican Construction Practice to Advise Nearshoring Clients
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250