Entering Its Fourth Year, the Award-Winning University of Houston's Pre-Law Center Is Just Getting Started
Now in its fourth year, Houston's Pre-Law Pipeline Program on May 30 begins eight weeks of courses for first-generation, low-income and underrepresented minority students. Some will explore whether a legal career is right for them, and others will seek focused help to bolster their law school applications and Law School Admission Test scores.
May 01, 2018 at 06:00 AM
7 minute read
Daniel Henry was studying to become an engineer, but something wasn't right.
Studying for his undergraduate engineering courses at the University of Houston was boring—a real chore—and he couldn't see himself in the field for the rest of his life. Then an African-American studies course made him realize his true passion was fighting for justice and helping the black community.
But how?
That question lead him to enroll in an innovative, intense diversity program at the University of Houston Law Center, unprecedented among Texas law schools and rare among nationwide law schools, which has won national accolades from diversity advocates.
“I just went to learn about the legal field, and I came out knowing [and] fighting for justice as an attorney was my purpose,” Henry said.
Now in its fourth year, Houston's Pre-Law Pipeline Program on May 30 begins eight weeks of courses for first-generation, low-income and underrepresented minority students. Some will explore whether a legal career is right for them, and others will seek focused help to bolster their law school applications and Law School Admission Test scores.
Henry isn't the only one who's found his passion for the law through the pipeline program.
Among the 86 students who went through the program over the past three summers, 58 are still working to complete their undergraduate degrees. As for those who are done or nearly done with undergrad, 18 have chosen to become lawyers: 11 are currently enrolled, and seven have been accepted. Another four have enrolled in graduate schools, and it's unknown what six students have chosen.
Among the 18 students planning to become lawyers, three students enrolled in Houston, and two more are starting there this fall. Other students have gone to schools spread around the country, such as Brooklyn Law School, George Washington University Law School, Howard University School of Law, Oklahoma City University School of Law , the University of Miami School of Law and the University of Oklahoma College of Law.
Houston Law Dean Leonard Baynes, who created the program, said its results are remarkable. He noted that although he wants as many pipeline students as possible to come to Houston, that's not the point of the program, nor his primary desire for the students.
“It's our responsibility to the profession, to make sure it has a wide swath of people,” he explained. “The most important thing is that they go to law school. I don't care where they want to go to law school—I just want them to pursue their dreams, and achieve their dreams.”
Houston's prelaw pipeline program is unprecedented among Texas law schools, although a smattering of law schools across the nation do offer similar programs. According to discoverlaw.org, Prelaw Undergraduate Scholars programs also exist at eight other law schools in California, New York, Ohio, Alabama, North Carolina, Maine, Wisconsin and Missouri.
However, Houston's program has won national accolades. INSIGHT Into Diversity magazine, which covers diversity and inclusion in higher education, recognized Houston two years in a row with its Higher Education Excellence in Diversity Award, which recognizes initiatives that embrace all aspects of diversity.
“It's one of the most intensive programs nationwide,” Baynes said of Houston's prelaw pipeline program.
To launch the program in the beginning, Houston Provost Paula Short provided $525,500 in funding for the program's 2015 and 2016 operations, according to Houston spokeswoman Carrie Criado. Also in 2016, the program received a $125,000 diversity pipeline grant from the AccessLex Institute, a nonprofit that provides student loans for underrepresented law students. The Law School Admission Council has also provided grants of $100,000 each year for 2018, 2019 and 2020.
Kristen Guiseppi, prelaw pipeline program manager, puts a lot of energy into recruiting pipeline students. She relies heavily on social media and email campaigns to get the word out, frequently contacts prelaw advisers across the nation, and also travels to undergraduate colleges and universities to recruit students directly.
She said that 49 percent of her students are black, and 34 percent are Hispanic. Seventy percent of the students come from Texas, and the rest come from all over the United States—New York, Georgia, Iowa, Miami, Oklahoma and more.
Students live on campus during the program, to make sure they're fully immersed in the law school world and focused on the program. The program is separated out into two tracks.
Students in the first track can get free tuition and room and board and a $1,000 stipend. The track teaches students about law school, allows them to network with attorneys, and requires them to take law school courses taught by Houston Law professors. There's also a three-week legal internship at legal employers like Bracewell, Greenberg Traurig, Lone Star Legal Aid, the Harris County District Attorney's Office and more.
The second track, open to undergraduate seniors, has a laser focus to help students prepare their law school applications: They craft resumes, personal statements or diversity statements and study for the LSAT for the entire eight-week program. Unlike the first track, second-track students must pay $2,500 for tuition, materials and room and board. There are scholarships and financial aid to help students pay.
Henry, the former engineering student, acted on his epiphany that a legal career was his destiny. After doing the first track of the pipeline program, he changed his major and started community service with an African-American community center that eventually hired him because he was volunteering so much.
The next summer, in 2017, he returned to the pipeline program for the second track. His LSAT score increased by 10 points, making him eligible for his top-choice law school. Henry, who wants to practice criminal justice law as either a defense lawyer or prosecutor, has already been accepted into that school, although he declined to name the school until he makes his attendance there official.
Henry's improved LSAT score is par for the course for pipeline students. Guiseppi said the median class increase is 11 points, although some students have increased their score as much as 17 points.
“What that does for our students is it takes them from potentially an LSAT score where they may not even be accepted to law school, to a point where they now have different law school options and they are eligible for scholarships,” she said.
Natalie Diala is one of the students who has already enrolled in law school—she chose Houston—after participating in the second track of the pipeline program. She found great success, making the dean's list for her first year of law school.
Diala said the pipeline program was instrumental in honing her abilities and continues to benefit her, even now. She gained an important mentor, already knew a lot of law professors, and even had formed relationships with the law school's dean and assistant deans. These connections have helped to hook up Diala with law students on law review, a law firm where she plans to work this summer, and more.
She said it's been important to her to be part of a major diversity initiative like the pipeline program.
“Being a law student, there aren't too many people who look like me in my classes. I'm not saying everyone who looks like me has the same opinion, but having that diversity of thought is important. It's something you may not be able to hear, if you all come from the same background,” said Diala. “Not all your clients and people you represent will think just like you and have the same opinion or background you have.”
Angela Morris is a freelance journalist. Follow her on Twitter at @AMorrisReports
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNewsmakers: University of Houston Law Center Receives $1.25 Million Gift for Mediation Clinic
Veteran Professor Seeks $2.5M In Compensatory Damages in Discrimination Suit Against Texas Southern University
Norton Rose Fulbright's New Houston Office Features Views of Urban Park
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
- 2UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 3Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
- 46th Circuit Judges Spar Over Constitutionality of Ohio’s Ballot Initiative Procedures
- 5On The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250