Litigator of the Week: Austin Lawyer Wins Nearly $1 Million Verdict Against Sitting Judge
Snell was able to convince a Bastrop County jury this week that Justice of the Peace Donna Thomson intentionally violated the Deceptive Trades Practices Act when she sold Snell's client a house without disclosing that she still had a mortgage on the property, hitting the judge with nearly $1 million in damages.
May 04, 2018 at 02:59 PM
5 minute read
Austin lawyer Jason Snell worried that his client may have trouble convincing a jury to award damages in his fraud trial last week—after all, the defendant he was suing just happened to be a well-known sitting judge in the same Central Texas courthouse where the trial was taking place.
Yet Snell was able to convince a Bastrop County jury this week that Justice of the Peace Donna Thomson intentionally violated the Deceptive Trades Practices Act when she sold Snell's client a house without disclosing that she still had a mortgage on the property, hitting the judge with nearly $1 million in damages.
“I feel like it really helped my case,” Snell said of Thomson's position as a judge. “In my opening statements, I read the oath of office that she took. And in that oath of office, she swore to uphold the laws of the State of Texas. And I think that was really impactful to the jury. That was the first thing I said in my opening statements and it was also the last thing I said in my closing argument.”
Snell's client, Raul Vasquez, owner of a Mexican restaurant in Bastrop, bought a home from Thomson in 2016 in a “contract for deed” lease-to-own arrangement, according to the petition in the case. Such contracts traditionally give tremendous advantages to sellers, who retain legal title to the property while the buyer's equity in the home remains at risk until the loan is repaid.
Under the terms of the contract, Vasquez alleged, he agreed to pay Thomson $150,000 for the house, paying her $30,000 up front followed by monthly installments of $1,300 until the property was paid off in full.
But by the summer of 2017, the suit claimed, Thomson began telling Vasquez that if he could not close on the property and pay off the loan in full by July 29, 2017, he was going to lose all the money he had paid prior, and that she would evict him from the property.
Vasquez then sued Thomson for breach of contract and deceptive trade practices, among other causes of action, alleging that Thomson failed to disclose to Vasquez that she didn't actually own the house outright, and still had a mortgage on the property.
“She did a number of things wrong, but the main thing she did was she did not disclose to my client that she had a sizable mortgage on the property. She told my client she owned it free and clear. And when my client walked into the property, he owed her less than what she owed the bank,” Snell said. “He was never going to be able to own the property because she was always going to owe the bank. She was upside down on it, and he didn't know that.''
Before submitting the case to a jury, the trial court judge ruled as a matter of law that Thomson violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act in her transaction with Vazquez, awarding him $57,300, representing the sum he'd already paid Thomson.
At trial, the jury was asked to consider whether Thomson acted “knowingly and intentionally” against Vasquez.
Thomson's lawyer argued that his client had not done anything intentionally wrong, and the dispute was the result of sloppy paperwork. To counter that argument, Snell found a 29-year-old Austin school teacher who had fallen victim to Thomson's deception with the same house as Vasquez, and the teacher testified at his trial, according to Snell.
“She moved out of the house when she found out she had been scammed and realized she'd never owned the house. And she didn't have the money for an attorney to go after Donna Thomson,'' Snell said of the witness. “And when we put on that testimony of the prior homeowner, it was a no-brainer for the jury. They were able to see that [Thomson] did this knowingly and intentionally.''
On May 1, the jury awarded Vasquez another $94,000 in actual damages and hit Thomson with $750,000 more in exemplary damages.
“I asked the jury to send a message to her and other public officials as well that when you're in a position of public trust and you don't honor it, there are harsh consequences,” Snell said. “The jury listened and sent that message.''
Thomson did not return a call for comment. Thomson's attorney, Phillip N. Slaughter of Smithville, also did not respond to a request for comment.
Vasquez is still in the house that Thomson sold him, but because she still has a mortgage on the property, Vasquez may never own it, Snell said.
“He's at a real loss. We have to find her assets,” Snell said of the defendant judge. “And with respect to the house, the only way he's going to be made whole on that is through the post-collection process.''
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHomegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
6 minute readHouston Appeals Court Split Over Race Discrimination Suit Involving COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250