AG Sessions' 'Zero-Tolerance' Policy at Border May Lead to More Work for Immigration Bar
The new policy means everyone who crosses the border could face criminal prosecution for illegal entry.
May 08, 2018 at 06:40 PM
3 minute read
A suspected immigrant is escorted by the U.S. Border Patrol to a vehicle near the U.S.-Mexico border in McAllen.(Photo by Eddie Seal/Bloomberg) |
Stepped-up immigration law enforcement in Texas under U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions' new “zero tolerance” policy may lead to more work for Texas lawyers who represent individuals in immigration matters.
“I can see that I would end up representing far more individuals in federal court for illegal entry and illegal re-entry,” said Jodi Goodwin, an immigration lawyer in Harlingen, located in the Rio Grande Valley.
On Monday, Sessions said during speeches in California and Arizona that the government would prosecute anyone illegally crossing into Texas or elsewhere on the southwest border and would separate children from parents. He first announced the zero-tolerance policy in April.
His remarks came on the heels of his announcement last week that his office would place a total of 35 new assistant U.S. attorneys, including eight in the Southern District of Texas, to handle an increase in illegal immigration cases.
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas has one of the heaviest immigration dockets in the country, and the eight new prosecutors will be charged with handling improper entry, illegal re-entry, and alien smuggling cases, prosecutors said. In fact, U.S. Attorney Ryan Patrick of the Southern District of Texas said they will handle “multiple thousands” of illegal entry, illegal re-entry and smuggling cases a year.
Michelle Saenz-Rodriguez, an immigration lawyer in Dallas at Saenz-Rodriguez & Associates, said enforcement of the zero-tolerance policy means that every person who comes over the border is subject to criminal prosecution for illegal entry. Sessions' directive, she said, has “everybody in a big tizzy.”
Prior to Sessions' announcement, people who crossed the border were typically administratively processed and then deported, Goodwin said. But with everyone heading to criminal court under the zero-tolerance policy, there may be more demand for private attorneys to represent individuals in those cases.
“I can imagine the number of people that will be showing up for Magistrate Court every day is going to skyrocket,” Goodwin said.
The charge for a first-time illegal entry is a misdemeanor and lawyers from federal public defender offices typically represent individuals in Texas facing that charge, Saenz-Rodriguez said. Most people decline representation and plead guilty to that misdemeanor charge.
And while the charge for first-time illegal entry carries a maximum sentence of six months in prison, the magistrate judges who hear those misdemeanor cases usually sentence the people to time served, which may be as little as a day, according to Goodwin.
But illegal re-entry charges, which can be brought if the individual was previously deported, are a felony, the lawyers said.
It remains unclear what effect the zero-tolerance policy will have on federal public defenders' offices, or whether they will be able to handle the expected increased caseload. Marjorie Meyers, the federal public defender in the Southern District of Texas, could not immediately be reached for comment.
Susan Bond, an immigration lawyer in Dallas who is chair of the State Bar of Texas immigration and nationality law section, said the Texas immigration bar is concerned about the impact that stepped-up enforcement will have on human rights.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChamberlain Hrdlicka Hires New COO, First-Ever Chief Business Development, Marketing Officer
4 minute readSurpassing Cravath Associate Pay Scale, Boutique Seeks to Stay Above Market
3 minute readWith Texas Legislature Back in Session in 3 Months, Austin's Graves Dougherty Launches Government Affairs Practice
1 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250