Citi Report: Demand, Revenue Declined at Texas Firms During First Quarter
Revenue was down 4.3 percent in Texas compared with the same period in 2017, and demand slid by 5.3 percent.
May 15, 2018 at 06:41 PM
3 minute read
Firms headquartered in Texas fared worse than the overall U.S. average during the first quarter of 2018, according to the Citi Private Bank Law Firm Group survey.
Revenue was down 4.3 percent in Texas during the first quarter of 2018, compared with the same period in 2017, and demand, which is the number of billable hours logged, slid by 5.3 percent for Texas firms.
In both cases, the declines in Texas were the largest among the 11 regions tracked by Citi for the industry survey.
In contrast, survey results for the overall U.S. legal industry showed that revenue grew by 4.2 percent during the first quarter and demand grew by 1.3 percent.
Texas firms also posted the lowest billing rate increase for the quarter, at 2.2 percent, compared with an overall 4.8 percent increase nationally. Also, expenses were up 5.9 percent for the Texas firms, compared with 4.8 percent overall.
Despite the “challenging start” to the year, the Texas region did not lag the legal industry in all areas, said David Altuna, a client adviser with Citi Private Bank's law firm group.
“The region did respond with a reduction in head count,” Altuna said, noting that Texas was the only region where firms reduced leverage, which is the ratio of salaried lawyers per equity partner.
Altuna said the decrease in leverage in Texas is important, considering the other metrics in Texas for the first quarter. “If you don't have the hours to support it, higher leverage won't necessarily drive profit,” he said.
Altuna said inventory improved nationally by 7.3 percent in the quarter, the strongest number for a first quarter since 2008, which is a condition that “does bode well for the rest of the year.” However, Texas inventory, which is work that is done but not collected, increased by only 3.4 percent.
“It's a tough start,” Altuna said of the Texas numbers. But he noted that circumstances can easily change over the rest of the year.
He said that the Texas results are based on eight firms headquartered in Texas. The national sample is based on 179 firms, including 80 Am Law 100 firms, 47 Second Hundred firms and 52 niche/boutique firms.
Because activity for out-of-state firms with Texas offices is not included in the Texas sample, Altuna said the broader picture may be rosier. Many firms are investing in Texas, launching or expanding offices in the state. As a result, Altuna said, it is likely that demand was higher in Texas than what was reflected in the numbers for the eight Texas firms.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNo Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Field Client Questions as Trump Issues Executive Orders on Industry Funding, Oversight
6 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250