Citi Report: Demand, Revenue Declined at Texas Firms During First Quarter
Revenue was down 4.3 percent in Texas compared with the same period in 2017, and demand slid by 5.3 percent.
May 15, 2018 at 06:41 PM
3 minute read
Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com |
Firms headquartered in Texas fared worse than the overall U.S. average during the first quarter of 2018, according to the Citi Private Bank Law Firm Group survey.
Revenue was down 4.3 percent in Texas during the first quarter of 2018, compared with the same period in 2017, and demand, which is the number of billable hours logged, slid by 5.3 percent for Texas firms.
In both cases, the declines in Texas were the largest among the 11 regions tracked by Citi for the industry survey.
In contrast, survey results for the overall U.S. legal industry showed that revenue grew by 4.2 percent during the first quarter and demand grew by 1.3 percent.
Texas firms also posted the lowest billing rate increase for the quarter, at 2.2 percent, compared with an overall 4.8 percent increase nationally. Also, expenses were up 5.9 percent for the Texas firms, compared with 4.8 percent overall.
Despite the “challenging start” to the year, the Texas region did not lag the legal industry in all areas, said David Altuna, a client adviser with Citi Private Bank's law firm group.
“The region did respond with a reduction in head count,” Altuna said, noting that Texas was the only region where firms reduced leverage, which is the ratio of salaried lawyers per equity partner.
Altuna said the decrease in leverage in Texas is important, considering the other metrics in Texas for the first quarter. “If you don't have the hours to support it, higher leverage won't necessarily drive profit,” he said.
Altuna said inventory improved nationally by 7.3 percent in the quarter, the strongest number for a first quarter since 2008, which is a condition that “does bode well for the rest of the year.” However, Texas inventory, which is work that is done but not collected, increased by only 3.4 percent.
“It's a tough start,” Altuna said of the Texas numbers. But he noted that circumstances can easily change over the rest of the year.
He said that the Texas results are based on eight firms headquartered in Texas. The national sample is based on 179 firms, including 80 Am Law 100 firms, 47 Second Hundred firms and 52 niche/boutique firms.
Because activity for out-of-state firms with Texas offices is not included in the Texas sample, Altuna said the broader picture may be rosier. Many firms are investing in Texas, launching or expanding offices in the state. As a result, Altuna said, it is likely that demand was higher in Texas than what was reflected in the numbers for the eight Texas firms.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUber Not Responsible for Turning Over Information on 'Dangerous Riders' to Competitor, Judge Finds
5 minute read5th Circuit Judge Jones Slams Proposal for Greater Amicus Brief Funding Disclosure
Trending Stories
- 1From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Julie Cantor, Associate General Counsel at Studs, Inc.
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Chris Correnti, President & CEO & General Counsel AGC America, Inc.
- 4‘What’s Up With Morgan & Morgan?’ Law, Advertising and a Calculated Rise
- 5Cravath Matches 'Special' and Year-End Bonuses
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250