Which Lone Star Law Firm Will Make the First Associate Salary Move?
Texas firms taking time to consider whether to meet new, higher market rates for associate salaries.
June 18, 2018 at 08:13 PM
3 minute read
In the ongoing chess game of associate salary raises, Texas firms seem to be waiting for someone else to make the first move.
A number of large firms around the country, including many with offices in Texas, have announced raises in the wake of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy's move on June 4 to announce a $190,000 starting salary for first-year associates. A week later, Cravath, Swaine & Moore then matched the Milbank scale and agreed to pay more for midlevel and senior associates. But no large local firms have stepped ahead of the Lone Star State pack as of yet.
This coming weekend, partners at Houston-based litigation boutique Susman Godfrey are meeting in Seattle for a retreat where associate salaries will be a topic of discussion, said Neal Manne, a managing partner of the high-powered firm, which is known for paying big money to recruit young talent.
“If I were a betting man … discussion would not be about meeting the Milbank-Cravath scale. It'll be about surpassing it,” Manne said last week.
Surpassing the new market rate for first-year salaries and the higher scale isn't a reach for Susman Godfrey, which also has offices in Los Angeles, New York and Seattle. The firm has been paying its first years a starting salary of $190,000 since July 1, 2016, when the firm made that salary move in response to the $180,000 salary scale previously set by Cravath in 2016.
At that time two years ago, Vinson & Elkins was the first big, Texas-based firm to announce salary hikes for its associates in response to Cravath's move, but many other large local firms also increased associate pay levels within the next few weeks—although not necessarily to the $180,000 first-year market level initially set by Cravath.
Vinson & Elkins has not yet made any announcements on the associate salary front. A number of other large firms in Texas are also not ready to announce anything.
“As with many firms we are reviewing the recent increase in associate compensation announced by several firms,“ said a statement from Baker Botts. “While we have not made a final decision we will, as we have in the past, remain competitive in terms of compensation packages.“
Managing partners of two Texas firms who were contacted about their firm's plans for associate raises also weren't ready to discuss the issue at all. One unnamed managing partner said he'd “rather duck” the issue right now.
Phil Appenzeller, CEO of Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, a regional firm with offices in Austin, Dallas and Houston that currently pays a $160,000 starting salary to first-year lawyers, said his firm constantly evaluates associate compensation and is cognizant of what competitors are doing.
“At this point, we aren't planning to make a move,“ Appenzeller said. “I'm not saying that won't change.“
Appenzeller added that Texas-based firms have to think about how clients will react to associate salary increases.
“Our clients understand that if we make those kind of moves, we have to make rates move, and I don't think clients want to pay for it,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSunbelt Law Firms Experienced More Moderate Growth Last Year, Alongside Some Job Cuts and Less Merger Interest
4 minute readOnce the LA Fires Are Extinguished, Expect the Litigation to Unfold for Years
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250