Former Houston Judge Disciplined for Jailing Mentally Ill Rape Victim Before Trial
A special court of review has approved the public admonishment of a former Houston state district court judge who ordered a mentally ill sexual assault victim jailed in order to secure her testimony at trial, a move that led to the woman being attacked by an inmate while in custody.
August 14, 2018 at 03:49 PM
4 minute read
A special court of review has approved the public admonishment of a former Houston state district court judge who ordered a mentally ill sexual assault victim jailed in order to secure her testimony at trial, a move that led to the woman being attacked by an inmate while in custody.
Stacey Bond, who served as the judge of the 176th District Court from 2013 until 2016, was given a public admonition by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct in March for violating the rights of Jane Doe, an unnamed homeless woman who was jailed for nearly a month on a bench warrant that the commission said didn't meet the legal prerequisites for a writ of attachment.
Bond appealed that decision to a special court of review, a panel of Texas intermediate appellate court justices, including Rebeca Martinez of San Antonio's Fourth Court of Appeals, Leanne Johnson of Beaumont's Ninth Court of Appeals, and Wade Birdwell of Fort Worth's Second Court of Appeals.
According to the court's Aug. 10 decision, Doe was brought to court by a Harris County District Attorney Office investigator to testify at trial but was never served a subpoena. During direct examination, Doe was incoherent, her responses were nonsensical, and she appeared to be responding to internal stimuli, the panel said.
Doe was later taken into custody for mental health reasons after a prosecutor had observed her to be a danger to herself and heard her say she was not going to return to the courthouse. Bond later signed a writ of attachment, or bench warrant, ordering the Harris County Sheriff's Department to hold Doe until she could appear in court.
Doe was housed in the general population at the Harris County Jail and was eventually assaulted by another inmate. Doe also allegedly had an altercation with a guard and was charged with assault on a public servant, according to the panel.
Doe's assault case was assigned to Bond's court. Bond recused herself from the assault case, noting that Doe was a complaining witness in a case before her, and that she “had a great deal of sympathy for this individual.” “It would be improper for me to oversee her case. I would feel terrible about punishing her,” Bond said, according to the panel.
The Harris County DA's office later dropped the assault charge against Doe. And three days after she testified at trial, Doe was released from her material witness bond and left the Harris County Jail.
A grievance was filed against Bond, which resulted in the commission concluding that Bond had violated several cannons of the Code of Judicial Conduct, warranting a public admonition for her actions.
On appeal, the special court essentially affirmed the commission's decision to admonish Bond.
“It is clear that Judge Bond appears to be remorseful for the treatment of Ms. Doe while in the custody of the sheriff. Nevertheless, Judge Bond contends that she followed the applicable law and that she should not be sanctioned because at most she merely made a mistake in signing a poorly worded form for a writ of attachment or bench warrant for a material witness,” the court wrote.
“While mere mistakes of law are generally not sanctionable, on the record before us, we conclude that Judge Bond made an egregious legal error and failed to act in a manner that promotes confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary,” the court wrote.
Mac Secrest, a Houston lawyer who represents Bond, didn't return a call for comment.
Bond, who is currently a candidate for the 185th District Court, also did not return a call for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllConspiracy Suits Against Quinn Emanuel, Roc Nation Moved to Federal District Court
JCPenney Seeks Return of More Than $1.1M From Jackson Walker For Bankruptcy Work
3 minute readHUD Charges Texas HOA With Housing Discrimination in Last Days of Biden Administration
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Every MAGA Will Buy It:' Elon Musk Featured in Miami Crypto Lawsuit
- 2Pennsylvania Law Schools Are Seeing Double-Digit Boosts in 2025 Applications
- 3Meta’s New Content Guidelines May Result in Increased Defamation Lawsuits Among Users
- 4State Court Rejects Uber's Attempt to Move IP Suit to Latin America
- 5Florida Supreme Court Disciplined 17 Attorneys
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250