Citi Survey: Revenue, Demand Down at Texas Firms in First Half of 2018
Demand and revenue growth declined in Texas during the first six months of the year, compared with the same period in 2017, according to a Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group report.
August 21, 2018 at 02:08 PM
3 minute read
Texas may have the most active lateral market in the country, but firm performance in the state lagged behind national trends in most areas tracked by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
Through June 30, law firms turned in their best half since the recession, according to City Private Bank's Law Firm Group 1H18 Flash Results, which includes data from 186 firms.
That was not the case in Texas.
Nationally, revenue at the 186 firms in the Citi survey grew by 5.5 percent and demand was up 2 percent during the first half of 2018 compared to the same period in 2017. But in Texas, revenue declined by 1.7 percent during that period compared to 2017 and demand—defined as hours logged—dropped by 4.7 percent. Seven firms are in the Texas sample.
John Wilmouth, senior client adviser in Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group, said demand was down in Texas by a greater percentage than in any of the other 11 regions of the United States during that six-month period.
“It's been a very competitive region, but I also should say it's also just been a volatile time for the industry as a whole,” Wilmouth said. ”It appears to be more of a roller coaster ride for the Texas firms.”
Texas firms fell short of the national results in other areas as well.
The collection cycle slowed by 6.6 percent in Texas during the period, compared with a collection cycle that lengthened by 2.4 percent nationally. Lawyer head counts dropped by 1.8 percent in Texas during the six-month period, in contrast to 1.8 percent growth nationally.
One positive for Texas is that expenses grew by only 1.5 percent during the six months, compared with a 4.8 percent growth nationally. Wilmouth said that slower growth in expenses in Texas could be related to the reduction in headcount.
Billing rates improved by about 2 percent at the Texas firms, compared with 4.5 percent nationally during the six months.
The national sample includes 77 AmLaw 100 firms, 53 Second Hundred firms and 56 niche/boutique firms. The Texas data includes seven firms ranging from Am Law 100 to niche-boutique firms.
Wilmouth said that because of volatility in the market, Texas firms could very well rebound during the second half of the year or in 2019, particularly if the firms step up collections. However, unbilled time in Texas was up by only 1.6 percent in the six-month period compared with the same period in 2017.
“The pipeline isn't up as much as it could be,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSeyfarth Launches Energy Transactions Practice in Houston With Polsinelli Team
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250